Laserfiche WebLink
Trapper's 2010 Mid Term Review Bond Liability Response <br />Trapper's current bond liability is $30,173,724. In the Mid Term Review (MTR), DRMS has estimated <br />Trapper's bond liability to be $31,127,989, resulting in a net increase in bond liability of $954,265. In <br />reviewing DRMS' calculations for this estimate of bond liability, Trapper has no objection to most of the <br />proposed changes. <br />However, with regard to the bond estimate for the K Pit Regrade Truck/Loader operation (Task 025 on <br />the CIRCES Cost Estimate provided by DRMS), Trapper disagrees with the assumptions used in the <br />calculation of this portion of the bond. The selection of a Caterpillar 992G front end loader to load <br />Caterpillar 777D haul trucks is an excellent choice; the 992G provides a good fleet match when paired <br />with the 777D truck. This loader is a better match to 777D trucks than Caterpillar 5090B excavator used <br />in the same calculation in PR-06. <br />Trapper specifically objects to the inclusion of a 1.25 Swell Factor in the Task 025 calculation for the <br />MTR. The 5,644,528 BCY in the initial volume is incorrectly identified as bank cubic yards. The material <br />used to regrade the K Pit in the worst case bond estimate will have been previously moved, and has <br />already experienced swell. It cannot physically swell an additional 25%. The Task 025 calculation for PR- <br />06 correctly identified this material as 5,644,528 LCY and did not apply a swell factor. The physical <br />properties of the material being replaced do not change based solely on a switch from one loading tool <br />(5090B in PR-06) to another (992G in MTR of PR-06). The loose volume of material to be moved should <br />be 5,644,528 LCY, not the 7,055,660 LCY used in the Division's estimate in the MTR. <br />With the incorrect volume, the total job time is estimated by the Division to be 7,682.77 hours at a fleet <br />cost of $1,183.62, resulting in an estimated total job cost of $9,093,506. When the volume is corrected, <br />the total job time, keeping all other assumptions constant, should be on the order of 6,150 hours, <br />resulting in an estimated total job cost on the order of $7,275,000. Not only is this lower than the <br />Division's current estimate with the MTR, it is lower than the PR-06 estimate of $8,496,612. This would <br />be the expected outcome when switching from a 7.5 LCY capacity loading tool (50906) that loads a 777D <br />in 10 passes to a 15 LCY capacity loading tool (992G) that loads a 777D in five passes. A more efficient <br />loading tool will reduce total fleet hours, offsetting the higher operating cost per fleet hour. <br />The second and final area of disagreement is with the Division's calculation of revegetation costs. The <br />MTR includes a 20% failure rate for vegetation (Tasks 100 -109). This has not been included in previous <br />calculations of Trapper's bond liability, nor has a 20% failure rate been experienced over Trapper's 30+ <br />year history of successful mined land reclamation. The actual failure rate at Trapper has been 0% over <br />the past 30+ years. This rate should be excluded from the Division's calculation of bond liability. <br />In conclusion, Trapper respectfully requests that the bond liability for the K Pit Regrade be recalculated <br />based upon the correct volume of 5,644,528 LCY. Also, revegetation costs should be recalculated <br />without the inclusion of an arbitrary failure rate. This should result in a net decrease in Trapper's bond <br />liability, as opposed to the net increase shown in the Division's initial calculation of bond liability for the <br />MTR. Trapper would expect the MTR bond liability to be on the order of $29,051,000.