My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-10-01_REVISION - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-10-01_REVISION - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:25:04 PM
Creation date
10/4/2010 1:32:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/1/2010
Doc Name
Objection Letter (faxed)
From
JoEllen Turner
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
DAB
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />FROM : SAN MIGUEL BASIN FORUM NEWS FAX NO. : 970 864 7856 Oct. 01 2010 03:01PM P1 <br />.t., 0 AQ? <br />Mr. David A. Berry <br />Office of mine Reclamation <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />October 1, 2010 <br />, Jzc? l(? <br />-3o `5 3 O? <br />30 -?-, 3? -?) - <br />(?Mr. ooa?? ) <br />Dear Mr. Berry: <br />This is in regards to the latest adequacy review that we were given on September 28, 2010. <br />We are objecting to PR 06 and it's contents. We are requesting a formal hearing in Denver <br />before the approval of PR-06. This adequacy report was terrible. Now the State is allowing in <br />addition to the numerous pages that aren't even a part of a permit revision, but allowing Western <br />Fuels to submit civil law suits, individual lease agreements, and numerous statements that aren't <br />related to a permit revision whatsoever. <br />If the State is going to continue to allow leases, then we want everyones lease agreement <br />submitted. We also would like a copy of Mel Staats lawsuit where Western Fuels removed his <br />prime top soil and hauled it to the Tri-State Power Plant and used it as fill dirt. The-,STOLF, the <br />soil from the adjacent property to give back to Mel. If all of our personal agendas are going to be <br />permitted as documentation, we want all that are mentioned in PR-06 to be included. <br />The State is allowing an Engineer firm to give their interpretations of what our lease agreement <br />says and left out all the major details. LAND OWNER CONSENT, OBLIGATIONS, RULES <br />AND REGULATIONS, NEGLIGENCE, NEGLIGENT MISCONDUCT, just to name a few. <br />Also, .PRIME FARMLAND RULES AND REGULATIONS, PROTECTION OF THE <br />LANDOWNER AND HIS PROPERTY, IRREPARABLE DAMAGES TO THE <br />ENVIRONMENT, KNOWINGLY AND WILLINGLY. Submitting documentation that is not <br />accurate as well as omitting information that is critical. <br />We are going to proceed forward with whatever we have to legally do until we have some type of <br />settlement offered to us. Royalty payments have ceased and Western Fuels is still mining and <br />blasting and everything on the Morgan Property. <br />No one understands, you cannot steal that much topsoil and prime soils from a landowner and <br />expect that landowner to supply the State and the Mine with more of their own soils to replace <br />what has been stolen from them. We are not going to permit this. Our soils, as has been <br />incorrectly documeuted, was in some places.72 inches deep, Barx/Darvey soils. They cannot be <br />duplicated nor the amount stolen from us cannot be replaced with what we had except by using <br />our very awn soils, soils that belong to us. Western Fuels does not have the Mineral rights to any <br />of those soils. The damages or loss that are mentioned are Worn. NORMAL mining practices, not
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.