My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-09-24_ENFORCEMENT - M1977300
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1977300
>
2010-09-24_ENFORCEMENT - M1977300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:23:28 PM
Creation date
10/1/2010 2:21:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
ENFORCEMENT
Doc Date
9/24/2010
Doc Name
Complaint for Judicial Review, Declaratory and Injunctive Relief
From
Cotter Corporation
To
DRMS
Violation No.
MV2010018
Email Name
AJW
DB2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
185 <br />1 I am -- I am scared to death that a <br />2 year from now if we -- if we take more time and go <br />3 back and try and find some solution that we haven't <br />4 already considered -- and frankly, we've considered <br />5 a lot of solutions here in the last couple of <br />6 months -- and back off from the position that we <br />7 presented to you all today, I believe that we are <br />8 going to be in a very bad situation. <br />9 I'm scared to death of the <br />10 circumstance that may exist if we -- if we take or <br />11 recommend a solution other than what we've brought <br />12 before you today. <br />13 MS. KRAEGER-ROVEY: Thank you. <br />14 Mike. <br />15 MR. KING: Madam Chair. I appreciate <br />16 you taking the opportunity to kind of crystallize <br />17 things in my mind. <br />18 I do agree that there is a -- if not <br />19 current contamination occurring from the mine pool, <br />20 there is a significant risk in the near future if <br />21 not -- like I said, if it's not occurring right now <br />22 for that mine pool to migrate into Ralston Creek. <br />23 I also think that the risk should be <br />24 borne by Cotter, not by people who consume water out <br />25 of Ralston Reservoir, and the cost as well should be
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.