My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-09-29_REVISION - M1981185 (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2010-09-29_REVISION - M1981185 (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:55:59 PM
Creation date
9/30/2010 10:57:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/29/2010
Doc Name
Conversion Application for a 112(d) Permit Part 1 Exhibit A thru Exhibit I Attachment 1
From
Wildcat Mining, Co.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May Day Idaho Mine Complex 112(d) Permit Application <br />. The historical tailings deposited on the floodplain are of unknown date or origin. These were <br />characterized by a uniform sandy loam texture, and while this material supported abundant <br />riparian vegetation, there was minimal soil development (Plate 5). A wetland mitigation project <br />was undertaken in 2008 within this material and did not show any soil development (Plate 5). <br />2.5 Mine Rock <br />Mine rock was present on the outslope of benches at the May Day No. 1, May Day No. 2, and <br />Lamb Operational Area. Mine rock was present above the Idaho Operational Area. These areas <br />were characterized by coarse, angular mine rock of gravel to cobble size with a matrix of fine <br />grained material on slopes of 30 -35 °. There was no evidence of soil development, but <br />regeneration was observed on these slopes (Plate 6). <br />3.0 Topsoil Availability <br />"Topsoil" describes soil that should be salvaged before project ground disturbance. It is suitable <br />for establishment and maintenance of plant growth, and is not necessarily the A, E, or B horizon, <br />but may be any or a combination of those horizons. For a soil horizon to be considered topsoil, it <br />had to meet the topsoil suitability criteria presented below: <br />• Less than 15% rock fragments. <br />• More than 1.0% organic matter. Soil color was used as the indicator of percent organic <br />matter. The horizon needed to have a l OYR 4/3, moist, or darker color to meet the <br />organic matter criterion. <br />• Loamy textures — silty clay loam, silt loam, loam, sandy clay loam, sandy loam, or clay <br />loam <br />• A pH between 6.5 and 7.8. <br />• Electrical conductivity (EC) of less the 8 decisiemens /m (dS /m) - estimated based on the <br />presence of visible salts; if visible salts were present the EC was considered greater than <br />8 dS /m. <br />• A sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) of less than 13 — estimated based on the presence of <br />columnar structure in the Bt horizon; if columnar structure was present the SAR was <br />considered greater than 13. <br />The main limiting factor for topsoil recovery is the presence of rock fragments. Soil salvaging <br />and stockpiling will not be undertaken for the following reasons: <br />• the collection of topsoil on the steep slopes will be difficult; <br />• the separation of topsoil from the rock fragments would greatly reduce the volume of <br />topsoil to be salvaged; <br />• the limited area to store stockpiled topsoil; and <br />• the fact that natural regeneration on disturbed areas indicates that topsoil is not required <br />for reclamation. <br />• <br />May Day Idaho Mine Complex 112(d) Permit Application <br />September 21, 2010 <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.