Laserfiche WebLink
River channel, however, the shadow (downstream) effect will be minimal (one foot or less) <br />and will not likely be detectable at 50 to 100 feet from the outside edge of the reservoir. <br />Records of the State Engineer indicate that there may be twenty four registered wells within <br />600 feet of the proposed mining site. Well information was summarized in Exhibit G of the <br />application materials. Of these twenty four wells, fourteen are deep wells finished in a <br />confined bedrock aquifer. The approximate location and depth of one well (Permit No. <br />60905) is unknown, although records of the State Engineer indicate that it is located south of <br />120th Avenue and upgradient of the proposed mining area. (Groundwater in the area of the <br />site flows in a north/north-westerly direction towards the South Platte River.) Of the ten <br />wells that are finished in shallow groundwater, two (Permit Nos. 99012A and 11020R) are <br />south of 120"' Avenue and upgradient. Two (Permit Nos. 10898R and 2437) are located <br />significantly east of the mining area, upgradient, and likely more than 600 feet away. One <br />(Permit No. 10899R) is owned by the Applicant and is inactive. <br />There appear to be four registered, active, shallow wells that are downgradient and within <br />600 feet of the proposed mining area. These four wells are generally located west of the site <br />and east of Brighton Road. According to records of the State Engineer, one (Permit No. <br />100919A,, owned by Richard and Geraldine Frost) is used for domestic purposes (but not <br />drinking water, as homes along Old Brighton Road are connected to the South Adams County <br />Water and Sanitation District.) Three of the four (Permit Nos. 55897F, 12992R, and 12993R) <br />are relatively high yield wells, used for crop irrigation. Don and Jeanne Off own two of these <br />wells; and the third is owned by Kirk Kirby. <br />On behalf of Don and Jeanne Off, who own approximately 15 acres immediately west of and <br />adjacent to the site, a consultant (Doty & Associates) has predicted possible impacts to the <br />nearest of the Offs' two high capacity, shallow wells. This well is 20 feet deep, with the <br />bottom 8 feet placed in ground water, although the aquifer is likely 15 to 30 feet thick in the <br />well's location. The report predicts that, right now, if the well is pumped at 500 gallons per <br />minute, 24 hours per day, for 180 days, water inside the well itself (not in surrounding <br />groundwater) would drop 5.1 feet, leaving only 3.9 feet of water in the well. Following <br />completion of the water storage reservoir, if this well was pumped at 500 gallons per minute, <br />24 hours per day, for 180 days, the report predicts that water inside the well would drop an <br />additional 1.8 feet and suggests that the "adjudicated right" of the Offs would be injured. In <br />these extreme pumping circumstances, not only does this report predict an effect that does not <br />appear significant; but it also misleads readers of what the Offs are entitled to from their well. <br />An adjudicated water right is relative to pumping rate (gpm) and to a beneficial use. The <br />Offs do not have a right to turn on their well and pump at 500 gpm for 6 months; rather they . <br />can take water at that rate for only so long as they can make beneficial use of the water for <br />irrigation. Further, the seniority of the Offs' water right does not give a right to an inefficient <br />means of diversion, such as this well, which reaches only 8 feet into the available water <br />supply. <br />Although all technical opinions appear to support a conclusion that there will be no effect on <br />nearby wells, the Applicant does appreciate the concerns of neighboring well owners, as there <br />are many variables that affect groundwater availability; and being out of sight, it is difficult to <br />correlate these variables with effects. Therefore, the Applicant is working on agreements <br />with the two well owners that have expressed concerns (Off and Frost) during the Adams <br />County conditional use application and hearing processes. For the Offs, the Applicant is <br />offering to construct a replacement well for their nearest high capacity well before <br />construction of the slurry wall is completed. As allowed by the Ofi ice of the State Engineer,