My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-06-04_REVISION - M2001085
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2001085
>
2003-06-04_REVISION - M2001085
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 3:01:22 PM
Creation date
9/28/2010 11:26:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001085
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/4/2003
Doc Name
Response to Comment Regarding Slope Stability
From
Ground Engineering Consultants
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C <br />GCEI?g <br />Y <br />jUN ®4 200 June 4, 2003 <br />,®ivisionOfMine rals&Geology Subject: Response to Comments Regarding <br />Slope Stability, Brighton Water Storage <br />Project, Adams County,'Colorado <br />Job No. 02-0065 <br />Mr. Tony Waldron <br />Colorado Division of Mines and Geology <br />Dear Mr. Waldron: <br />Ground Engineering Consultants, Inc., (GROUND) performed a subsurface exploration <br />program and slope stability analyses for the site of the proposed Brighton Water Storage <br />Project southeast of the intersection of 124' Avenue and U.S. Highway 65, in Adams . <br />County, Colorado. Our findings, conclusions and recommendations are summarized in <br />GROUND's report, Slope Stability Analyses, Brighton Water Storage Project, Adams <br />County, Colorado, Job No. 02-0065, prepared for Les Ewegen, LLC, dated May 31, <br />2002. At the request of Les Ewagen, LLC, -we have reviewed comments by the <br />Colorado Division of Mines and Geology indicating violations pertaining to temporary <br />slope stability. These Comments and our responses.are presented below. Reference is <br />made to our May 31, 2003, report for a description of• the $its surface and subsurface <br />conditions, our general gsotechnical findings and recommendations, and the Limitations <br />on our work, which also apply to GROUND's conclusions and recommendations <br />provided herein. We consider all recommendations in that report n,ot specifically <br />supersedea nereln to remain vano. <br />We understand that measurements by the Division of Mines and Geology on February <br />11, 2003, indicated that certain temporary slopes at the subject facility were at 68 <br />percent, 70 percent and 71 percent slope gradients - corresponding to slope -angles of <br />about 34 to 351/2 degreep above horizontal. The measured slopes, therefore, were <br />ENGINEERING CON 5ULT ANT5 <br />Phone OnW 2119.1989 Fax (303) 2R4-iGBG <br />91 j»varnesx C1CIvr East, Englewood, C:O 60112-5412 <br />re: 7393 D&LIa Street, commerce r1ty, GO 80022-1834 www sroundeng.com <br />JVar[h <br />60 39Vd N393M3 66060Sb0L6Z Z6;SZ £006/b0/90
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.