Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Table 9: Uncompahgre Field Office Sensitive Species <br />• <br /> <br />= Canlwou ante - <br />Scientific i?amc ? <br /> <br />' -40 <br />_, <br />o L. <br />Pr ce in <br />Pra?ect Area <br /> , <br />San Rafael milkvetch Astragalus <br />ra aelensis Outside the known range of this species <br />Sandstone milkvetch Astragalus Outside the known range of this species <br /> ses ui orus <br />Gypsum Valley cateye Cryptantha <br />gypsophila Outside the known range of this species <br />Fragile (slender) Cryptogramma No suitable habitat <br />rockbrake stelleri <br />Kachina daisy (fleabane) <br />Eri <br />cachinonens <br />ka <br />hini s <br /> <br />Outside the known range of this species <br />Montrose (Uncompahgre) <br />bladd od Lesquerella vicina Outside the known range of this species <br />Colorado (Adobe) desert Lomatium Outside the known range of this species <br />parsley concinnum <br />Paradox Valley (Payson' s) <br />lupine Lupinus crassus Outside the known range of this species <br />Dolores skeleton plant Lygodesmia <br />doloresenis Outside the known range of this species <br />Eastwood's monkey- Mimulus No suitable habitat present <br />flower eastwoodiae <br />Paradox (Aromatic Pediomelum Outside the range of this species <br />Indian breadroot aromaticum <br />Great Basin silverspot Speyeria nokomis Species confirmed in Delta County, but no suitable <br />butterfly nokomis habitat or confirmed populations in the CEL area <br />References: Weber and Wittman 2001, Kingery 1998, Hammerson 1999, Spackman et al. 2002, CDOW 2010c, CDOW <br />2010b, Monarch and Associates 2009, Carrillo 2010, Selby 2007. <br />z Also a USFWS Candidate species (USFWS 2010a). <br />3 Also a Colorado State Endangered or Threatened species (CDOW 2010c). <br />Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: <br />Proposed Action - The impact analysis contained in the 2005 Spruce Stomp EA, the <br />2005 BA (Gault Group 2005) for the Spruce Stomp EA, the 2009 BA and Evaluation (Monarch <br />and Associates 2009), and the 2010 BA (BLM 2010c) for the BLM portion of the CEL area <br />adequately describe the potential impacts of CEL activities on Endangered, Threatened, <br />Candidate Species, and Critical Habitat within the CEL area. There is no designated critical <br />habitat for listed species in the project area. <br />No direct physical impacts to endangered Colorado River fish are anticipated as a result of the <br />proposed project. However, the endangered fish and their Critical Habitat on the lower <br />Gunnison River and Colorado River (USFWS 1994) could be adversely impacted by the 1.5 acre <br />feet of water depletion that would result from the proposed action. In a Biological Opinion <br />rendered for BLM on February 5, 2009, by the USFWS (#ES/GJ-6-CO-08-F-0010), it was <br />determined that such depletions are likely to adversely affect the Endangered Colorado River <br />fish and their designated Critical Habitat. A 2007 Biological Opinion rendered by the USFWS <br />(ES/GJ-6-CO-99-F-033-CP062) for USFS lands arrived at the same finding. <br />DOI-BLM-CO-S050-2010- 0017 EA Page 25 of 43 May 2010