My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-09-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1984067
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1984067
>
2010-09-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1984067
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:23:00 PM
Creation date
9/23/2010 10:53:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984067
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
9/21/2010
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Complianace for SL1
From
Phase III/TOJ
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
all vegetative cover) provided by grass species was 49.4% in 2008 and 73.1 % in 2009. Perennial <br />cool season grasses dominated the grasses, with the most abundant species being thickspike <br />wheatgrass and intermediate wheatgrass. Additional significant herbaceous cover was provided by <br />western wheatgrass and smooth brome. Forbs comprised relative cover of 49.9% in 2008 and 18.3% <br />in 2009. Forbs were cool season perennial, biennial, and annual species, dominated by yellow <br />sweetclover, various mustards, and some weeds. The most abundant weed species (Musk thistle, <br />Canada thistle, bindweed, and mullein) together comprised 2.9% of relative cover in 2008 and 7.1 % <br />of relative cover in 2009. Twelve species of desirable forbs were identified in the 2009 samples. <br />Two woody shrub species, Rubber Rabbitbrush and Wood's rose, appeared in the sample data with <br />Rubber Rabbitbrush comprising 7.5% relative cover in 2008 and 0.7% relative cover in 2009. <br />Although the vegetative sample data fell short of the approved revegetation success criterion of 70% <br />live cover, the data compare favorably with the following technical standards for cover and species <br />diversity that were adopted by the Division at a pre-law coal mine site, the Blue Flame Mine, located <br />approximately nine miles to the southwest. The Blue Flame site is similar to the Coal Gulch site in <br />terms of pre-law disturbance, climatic conditions, soil erodibility characteristics, and postmining <br />land use. <br />Cover and Diversity Technical Standards at Blue Flame Mine <br />Herbaceous cover: 30% <br />Species diversity: 2 cools season grasses <br />2 warm season grasses <br />2 forbs <br />2 shrubs <br />No single species shall compose more than 40% <br />or less than 3% relative cover <br />The sample data from the Coal Gulch Mine indicate the reclaimed areas have a diverse assemblage <br />of grasses and forbs, with a woody shrub population that is beginning to develop. The grasses, forbs, <br />and shrubs on the Coal Gulch site are a self-sustaining mix of vegetation that provides long-term <br />erosional stability. Open grass land on the disturbed area of the site is surrounded by undisturbed <br />valley slopes that are covered by woody shrubs which provide areas of wildlife cover and forage. <br />Erosion Control and Sediment Yield <br />The vegetative cover on reclaimed areas appears to be preventing most rill and gully formation. <br />During the bond release inspection and recent inspections, hillslopes showed significant down- <br />cutting from concentrated flow only on the waste pile. No delta or sediment fans have been found on <br />the site during recent inspections, with the exception of the sediment fan near the center of the site <br />that comes from the adjacent Arness McGriffin site. <br />Using the observed cover values in the Universal Soil Loss Equation, the calculated soil loss rate is <br />6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.