Laserfiche WebLink
2.04.9 -6. The two references to Darvey -Barx soils in the original permit area should instead <br />apply solely to Barx soils, since the Darvey -Barx complex was identified only in the PR -5 <br />revision area. For clarity, the reference to "this unit' in the next to last sentence of the paragraph <br />should be changed to "the Darvey -Bari map unit'. <br />The various references to "Darvey -Bari" have been modified to match DRMS <br />recommendations in this item. <br />4Z. Language was amended as requested, but further clarification is requested in the final sentence of <br />Item 4Y, above. <br />See Item 4Y. <br />4AA. The Division requested that reference to 90% recovery for prime farmland topsoils near the end <br />of subsection 15, be changed to 93% recovery, for consistency with other permit sections. An <br />incorrect reference to 90% recovery remains in the amended text near the end of subsection 15. <br />Please correct the reference. <br />Reference has been changed to 93 %. <br />4AB. This item requested certain clarifications regarding pre -2008 soil lift stripping thicknesses as <br />described in subsection 16. The first paragraph of the subsection was properly revised, with <br />respect to Benson and Lloyd properties. However, the confusing language regarding <br />"confirmation" of mixed lift thickness, and reference to replacement depth rather than <br />replacement thickness remains unchanged in the 2 " sentence of the 2 "d paragraph of subsection <br />16. Please delete the 2 "d sentence of the 2 " paragraph. <br />The sentence has been deleted as requested. <br />4AC. This item noted numerous discrepancies on Tables 2.04.9 -7A and 2.04.9 -713. The tables address <br />soil salvage acreages and volumes projected for the various soil map units on, respectively, the <br />Morgan property and the properties north of BB Rd and West of 2700 Rd. Most of the <br />discrepancies appear to have been corrected, but we have a remaining question regarding an <br />unnumbered footnote at the bottom of each table, which indicates that the table acreages do not <br />accurately represent the actual area of disturbance (due to limited areas not covered by the 1998 <br />soil survey). However, Table 7A acreage total listed is 107.96 acres, which corresponds with the <br />total Morgan property disturbance acreage listed in other sections of the application. For the area <br />north of BB and West of 2700 Rd., the area covered by the 1998 survey was very close to the <br />entire disturbance area. Presumably, the acreage totals for the various map units were adjusted <br />in both tables to correspond to total disturbance acreage for the subject areas, which would <br />render the footnote moot. Please clarify whether this is the case, and revise or delete the <br />unnumbered footnote on each table, as appropriate. <br />The total areas for the various map units have been updated in the tables, and the <br />unnumbered footnotes have therefore been deleted. <br />4AD. An erroneous reference in subsection 16.4, to Section 2.05.3(5) topsoil balance assessment for <br />the Morgan property was corrected as requested. <br />Resolved. <br />4AE. The last two sentences of subsection 16.7 were properly revised to address compliance with Rule <br />4.06.2(5). <br />Resolved. <br />