My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-09-22_REVISION - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-09-22_REVISION - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:23:20 PM
Creation date
9/22/2010 5:00:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/22/2010
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy No. 5
From
Greg Lewicki & Associates
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
b. Further along in the subsection 10.1 narrative, there is a sentence that states "Soil type <br />70B and D70B lists Barx soil as a major component and Barx as a secondary component <br />(30 percent of map unit) in 98E on Map 2.04.9 -1 ". This sentence is incorrectly written. <br />Please restate as follows: "Bari soil is a major of component of Map Units 70B and <br />D7013, and a secondary component of Map Unit 98E (30% of unit), listed on Map 2.04.9- <br />1 " <br />The sentence has been rewritten to match DRMS's preferred text. <br />c. As detailed in the Introduction to Section 2.04.9, three separate soil surveys were conducted. <br />Subsection 10.1 fails to include the 1996 survey conducted for PR -04 by IRI. Please revise <br />the text in the second paragraph of 10.1 to include reference to the 1996 survey and to the <br />1996 letter from the NRCS that addressed the issue prime farmlands for PR -04. <br />Information regarding the 1996 soil survey and NRCS letter reference has been added <br />to subsection 10.1 of Section 2.04.9. <br />d. Toward the end of subsection 10.1 narrative, there is a sentence that states "the October 1992 <br />NRCS letter was misinterpreted by DBMS..." Please either delete "by DRMS" or rephrase <br />to state "by WFC and DRMS..." <br />Narrative changes to "by WFC and DRMS._" <br />4F -4G. Resolved. <br />4H. See Comment 41). <br />4I. The Division requested clarification regarding "prime farmlands" vs. "prime farmland soils ". <br />Acceptable wording in response to the Division's request was incorporated into the narrative of <br />subsection 10.4, Item 2. Several sentences regarding Morgan lands in the permit area are <br />unnecessarily repeated in the final paragraph of amended subsection 10.4, Item 2. Please delete <br />the unnecessary paragraph. Paragraph deleted. <br />4J. Resolved. <br />4K. This item addressed certain apparent discrepancies among text in Sections 2.04.9 and <br />2.05.4(2)(d), and related maps 2.04.9 -2, 2.05.4 -4, 2.05.4 -6, and 2.05.4 -7, with respect to soil <br />replacement. <br />a. This item requested corrected map citation and terminology clarifications. Resolved, <br />b. Confusing terminology was revised. Resolved. <br />c. Erroneous text was deleted. Resolved. <br />d. Clarification regarding soil salvage as related to soil replacement commitments was <br />provided. Resolved. <br />e. Extraneous text was deleted as requested. Resolved. <br />f The Division noted that Map 2.05.4 -6 erroneously indicated that Lift B soil had been "all <br />placed as of June 2010" within the 31.68 acre soil replacement Zone 3, on the eastern <br />Morgan property. DRMS requested that the map notation be revised to state, "None <br />Placed as of June 2010 ", to accurately reflect the status of Lift B soil replacement in Zone <br />3. The map notation was not revised in WFC's initial response submittal to Adequacy <br />Review No. 4. However, WFC corrected the oversight and submitted a corrected <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.