My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-09-22_REVISION - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-09-22_REVISION - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:23:20 PM
Creation date
9/22/2010 5:00:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/22/2010
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy No. 5
From
Greg Lewicki & Associates
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
e. There are problems regarding >/< symbols for certain parameters and soil zone categories on <br />Table IB. For EC, all of the threshold levels listed lack the necessary > symbols. Boron <br />lacks the > symbol, for Bench 1 Surface Spoil. <br />Symbols corrected in Table I B. <br />f. On Table 1 B, the rock fragment threshold for Zone 8 mixed topsoil (Below 2 feet) is <br />incorrectly listed as "N /A "; the correct threshold listing is " >35 % ". Also on Table 1 B, the <br />cell for Zone 8 Rock Fragment content was left blank; should be "N /A ". The Sample Grid <br />for Zone 7 Mixed Topsoil should be 1 per 5 acres, rather than 1 per 2.5 acres. <br />Zone 8 suitability values have been corrected as requested. <br />Please amend the tables as warranted. <br />The tables have been amended to satisfy the above AR -05 items. <br />76B. -C. See Comment 76A, above. <br />76D. This item concerned portions of Table 1 and 1 B footnote material which the Division felt were <br />no longer applicable. In addition, the item requested additional detail regarding methodology for <br />rock fragment sampling. Finally, in response to Table modifications recommended by the <br />Division, the operator presented reasons to delete the rock fragment sampling requirement for <br />certain replacement zone topsoil lifts. <br />a. Amended footnotes are presented following Table 1B. The footnote narrative is then <br />reiterated in somewhat different and outdated language in four narrative paragraphs on the <br />following page, which appear to be relic from the previous version of the text. The outdated <br />paragraphs should be deleted. <br />The outdated paragraphs have been deleted. <br />b. The rock fragment sampling description was amended as requested in the amended footnotes. <br />Resolved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.