2010-09-20_HYDROLOGY - M1977425 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

09-20-10;03:05PM; ;970-498-5678 # 14/ 32 of a Petition made -,i good faith, stating the t--:teal basis upon which it is asserted that injury to vested rights has occurred. 27- objector, Central, filed suit against the State Engineer in Case No. 89-CW--170, Water ivisionted.pI contending, among other things, that exempting Pits excava and crediting December r31, , 1980 f=OM destructiontof phxeatophytesa water user, for water saved by rendered is contrary to law and unconstitutional.. A decision was as renn the in the Water Court, Water Division No. and isTon parties agree Colorado Supreme Court in Case No. to be bound by the rulings of the Colorado Supreme Court withto respect to the above issues and make such rulings applicable this case. If the Colorado Supreme December findsltha theand/or exemption of pits excavated prior phreatophyte credit is unlawful or unconstitutional thenathishall decree shall be amended to, remove such credit and app be required to provide fall augmentation, will the fallowing months: result in an increase in augmentation January 0: February 0; March 9.0; April 16.1; May 17.9; June 28.3; July 33.8; August 31.7, September October 13.9; November 7.1; December 6.3. If the Supreme Court hand s the oexemption of to December 31, 1980, PhreatoPhyte constitutional, they no amendment of this decree shall be necessary. NO OBJECTION TO ENTRY OF THE FOREGOING DECREE: FISCHER, BROWN, HUDDLESON & GUNN, illiam H. B own, Reg. No. 2088 Attorneys for the Cache La Poudre Water Users AssaciatiOn P_o. Drawer J. Fart Collins, Colorado 80522 LIND, LAWRENCE & OTTENHOFF By: Reg. Na_ 8366 Kim R. Lawrence, Attorneys for Central. Colorado Water Conservancy District and the Ground Water Management subdistrict of the Central Colorado Water Cons- ervancy District The Law Building, loll llth Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80632 13