My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-08-31_ENFORCEMENT - M1977300
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1977300
>
2010-08-31_ENFORCEMENT - M1977300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:20:34 PM
Creation date
9/15/2010 11:58:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
ENFORCEMENT
Doc Date
8/31/2010
Doc Name
Petition of Cotter Corp. for Reconsideration of Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
From
Holme Roberts & Owen LLP
To
DRMS
Violation No.
MV2010018
Email Name
DB2
AJW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BEFORE THE MINED LAND RECLAMATION BOARD <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Notice of Violation No. MV-2010-018 <br />PETITION OF COTTER CORPORATION (N.S.L.) FOR RECONSIDERATION OF <br />FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER <br />IN THE MATTER OF COTTER CORPORATION'S POSSIBLE VIOLATIONS, CEASE AND <br />DESIST ORDER, CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, AND CIVIL PENALTIES, File No. M-1977-300 <br />Pursuant to 2 CCR 407-1, Rule 2.9, Cotter Corporation (N.S.L.) ("Cotter") hereby <br />requests that the Mined Land Reclamation Board (`Board") reconsider its decision issued <br />August 11, 2010 in the matter of Cotter Corporation's possible violations, cease and desist order, <br />corrective actions, and civil penalties ("Order"). <br />Cotter recognizes the goal of the Board's August 11, 2010. Order to achieve compliance <br />with applicable stream standards in Ralston Creek. Cotter agrees with this goal, but strongly <br />disagrees that dewatering the mine to 500 feet below the Steve Level and treatment of mine pool <br />water will contribute to achieving that goal. It also strongly disagrees that the mine pool <br />provides a basis for finding any violation of the Mined Land Reclamation Act ("Act") and <br />assessing penalties against Cotter. Cotter presents below an explanation of the grounds <br />justifying reconsideration. It requests the opportunity to present oral argument on this petition <br />pursuant to 2 CCR 407-1, Rule 2.9.3. <br />1. The Order That Cotter Violated the Act Should Be Reconsidered Insofar as It Is <br />Based on Findings of Fact or Conclusions of Law Involving the Mine Pool. <br />This Board should reconsider the Order insofar as such Order is based on findings of fact <br />or conclusions of law involving the mine pool. In finding that the mine pool supports a violation
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.