My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1995-08-11_REVISION - M1977493 (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
1995-08-11_REVISION - M1977493 (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:27:01 PM
Creation date
9/14/2010 12:30:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/11/1995
Doc Name
EPP-IV
From
CMC
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR7
Email Name
ACS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> The mine and mill can operate only by having carryover storage to get through the winter. When <br /> the Company first constructed an operation at the headwaters of Ten Mile Creek in 1918, the mill was <br /> able to operate on the water flow in Ten Mile Creek. But by the 1920's, when expansions began, it was <br /> evident that Ten Mile Creek was not large enough to support the expanded milling capacity. Therefore <br /> Climax began reclaiming process water. In the early mill designs, water reclaim and reuse were a very <br /> significant part of the mill design. The mill expansion of 1929 had four tailing thickeners specifically for <br /> the purpose of reclaiming water prior to it reporting to the tailing ponds. <br /> Tailina Deposition <br /> Due to the topography at Climax, the mine has always striven to use gravity for transportation of <br /> tailing rather than pumping tails. This has led to numerous expansions of the tailing ponds over 75 years, <br /> along with reclamation of ponds as they were removed from service. Climax utilizes valley-fill upstream <br /> tailing dams. As the ponds increased in size and thereby received more runoff from the surrounding <br /> mountains, it became standard operating procedure in the springtime to relieve the ponds of as much <br /> process water as possible and bring in fresh water to replace it. <br /> This mode of springtime water regeneration was standard procedure from 1930's to 1960's. By <br /> that time, the expansion of tailing facilities and mounting social pressures led to a change in operating <br /> procedures. There remained a need to have all the ponds and reservoirs low enough to accept the <br /> smowmelt, but by the mid-1960's, the object of the spring discharge changed from releasing process <br /> water to that of simply bypassing the high water flow to ensure stability of the ponds. It should be noted <br /> that in 1958, a new tailing pond was begun. This pond increased the size of the tailing impoundments <br /> from 140 ha to more than 600 ha. <br /> It became evident by the early 1970's the Clean Water Act would significantly affect the operation. <br /> The first move therefore, was to prevent contamination of clean water to the greatest degree possible. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.