Laserfiche WebLink
. forming materials..." EPFs as defined are present and operational at the Climax Mine site. <br /> Because of Climax's unique geographic position affecting both sides of the Continental Divide and <br /> three distinct and major watersheds, the following discussion of EPFs and controls is organized <br /> by watershed. This relationship is clarified in Table 2. Within the three watersheds, defined <br /> EPFs involve (in no particular order): 1) control of run-off which contacts potentially <br /> contaminated material; 2) the process water circuit which includes the tailing impoundments and <br /> seep water control systems; 3) mine water drainage and control systems; 4) designated <br /> chemicals used in the milling process; 5) dust suppression systems; and 6) the water treatment <br /> and discharge system including designated chemicals used therein. Specific details such as <br /> impacted acreages, etc. of specific areas are found in the Mining and Reclamation Permit, <br /> Technical Revisions, and Amendments. The EPFs discussed throughout this EPP are shown on <br /> Figures 2 and 3. <br /> 5.1 Arkansas River Watershed <br /> 5.1.1 Potential Sources of Contamination <br /> The upper Arkansas River watershed contains those portions of the Climax site which supported <br /> the historic underground mining operations. The primary area of potential impact is the Storke <br /> • yard just east of the hairpin turn on Highway 91. This area has been the focus of major closure <br /> and reclamation activity since 1993. In 1994, equipment was removed and buildings were <br /> demolished in preparation for final reclamation activities in this area in 1995 and beyond. The <br /> area of the Arkansas River to the south southwest of the Storke yard was reclaimed in the late <br /> 1980s into the early 1990s. This area terminates in the gravel pit at the Climax property line. <br /> The Arkansas River runs through this reclaimed gravel pit before leaving the property. <br /> There are four (4) sources of potential contamination to this portion of the Arkansas River <br /> watershed: 1) Acidic water from the flooded underground workings; 2) Run-off and seepage <br /> from the Storke yard; 3) Catastrophic failure of the two industrial process water tanks located <br /> adjacent to the mill complex; and 4) Run-off from road cuts on Ceresco Ridge above the Storke <br /> yard. <br /> Prior to closure, the entrance to the underground operation at Climax was through the No. 5 Shaft <br /> and the Storke Portal at the Storke yard. When the underground operation was terminated in <br /> December 1994, equipment was salvaged and the workings were allowed to flood naturally. <br /> Water in contact with sulfide mineralization underground meets the definition of"Acid Mine <br /> Drainage" in Rule 1.1 (2), and, thus, is a potential source of contamination to the upper Arkansas <br /> River watershed should water levels rise uncontrolled and overtop the No. 5 Shaft. <br /> The Storke yard historically incorporated some mine waste rock material for construction fill. <br /> 14 <br />