My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996-02-06_REVISION - M1977493 (14)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
1996-02-06_REVISION - M1977493 (14)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:27:02 PM
Creation date
9/13/2010 2:29:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/6/1996
Doc Name
SWMP-III
From
CMC
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR7
Email Name
ACS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • <br />Chapter 4-Site-Specific Industrial Storm Water BMPs <br />• drainage behind the bulkhead or retaining wall to prevent erosion around the structure. Gabion and <br />grid pavers should be installed according to manufacturers' recommendations. <br />Stream bank stabilization structures should be inspected regularly and after each large storm event. <br />Structures should be maintained as installed. Structural damage should be repaired as soon as <br />possible to prevent further damage or erosion to the stream bank. <br />Advantages of Stream Bank Stabilization <br />• Can provide control against erosive forces caused by the increase in storm water flows <br />created during land development <br />• Usually will not require as much maintenance as vegetative erosion controls <br />• May provide wildlife habitats <br />• Forms a dense, flexible, self-healing cover that will adapt well to uneven surfaces (riprap) <br />Disadvantages of Stream Bank Stabilization <br />• Does not provide the water quality or aesthetic benefits that vegetative practices could <br />• Should be designed by qualified professional engineers, which may increase project costs <br />• May be expensive (materials costs) <br />• May require additional permits for structure <br />• May alter stream dynamics which cause changes in the channel downstream <br />• May cause negative impacts to wildlife habitats <br />• <br />4-59
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.