My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-09-02_REVISION - C1981012
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2010-09-02_REVISION - C1981012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:21:25 PM
Creation date
9/3/2010 2:01:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/2/2010
Doc Name
Incompleteness Letter
From
DRMS
To
New Elk Coal Company, LLC
Type & Sequence
PR2
Email Name
KAG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. The application does not contain information required by Rule 2.03.6 regarding right of <br />entry for the area described by the proposed permit boundary. See also #6 below. <br />DRMS Response: Rule 2.03.6(1) requires "a complete and detailed description of the proposed <br />permit boundary... " No such description was included with the revised materials. Please <br />submit a revised permit page 2.03.6 including the required information for the entire permit <br />boundary as proposed. <br />4. The application does not contain any information required by Rules 2.04.5 and 2.04.6 for <br />Hydrology and Geology. In particular, any baseline data for the Apache seam in areas <br />outside of the current permit boundary was not included. Allen seam baseline data is <br />minimal or non-existent. Apache Canyon surface water data representing seasonal <br />variations was not included. <br />DRMS Response: The application remains incomplete with regard to Rules 2.04.5 and 2.04.6 for <br />Hydrology and Geology. Revised information is completely lacking, or at best extremely <br />broad or vague and lacks any detail or specificity. Please refer to Rule 2.04.5 and <br />2.04.6(3) for underground mining and provide the information required by each subpart of <br />these Rules. <br />5. Reference is made to the 1989 permit boundary. The usage of that term is confusing and <br />vague, at best. Please ensure all maps and text identifies a permit boundary for the area as <br />proposed under this revision. <br />DRMS response: Now complete. <br />6. Revised surface and coal ownership maps were not submitted showing the proposed permit <br />boundary. Please refer to Rule 2.10, Maps and Plans, and ensure that these maps, in <br />addition to all other maps comply with the requirements of Rule 2.10 and show the new <br />permit boundary as proposed. <br />DRMS response: Now complete. <br />7. Information required under Rule 2.05.6(6), Subsidence Survey, Subsidence Monitoring, and <br />Subsidence Control, was only partially submitted. All structures require a brief description <br />and require location on a map. Roads, buildings, wells, pipelines, compressor stations, <br />stock ponds, and any other man-made structures are considered structures under this Rule. <br />The applicant must describe the worst possible consequences for each of the structures and <br />subsidence control plans and monitoring for each. At this time, the subsidence control <br />plan, monitoring, and mitigation for the gas wells has been developed assuming Allen seam <br />mining. Please refer to #10 below. <br />DRMS response: Partially complete. The application is now complete with regard to a subsidence <br />control plan for the Allen and the Apache seam. The application remains incomplete with <br />regard to the rest of the original question.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.