My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-08-30_REVISION - C1981008 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-08-30_REVISION - C1981008 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:20:28 PM
Creation date
8/31/2010 7:09:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/30/2010
Doc Name
Revised Bond Release Application
From
Greg Lewicki and Associates, PLLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL12
Email Name
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
any pyrite (FeS2) oxidation gets neutralized by calcite (CaC03) present in the same spoil <br />material. This results in the iron precipitating as iron oxides. The slightly higher than normal <br />pH of the natural water means that there is sufficient acid-neutralizing ions such as hydroxyl <br />(OH-) or bicarbonate (HC03-) in solution to absorb the acidic hydrogen (H+) ions produced by <br />the pyrite oxidation. Soluble sulfate (S04_2) ions are also produced by the pyrite oxidation, <br />and they are quickly taken up by the calcite to produce calcium sulfate or gypsum (CaSO4)1 <br />which is not very soluble and also precipitates out of solution, especially when the pH of the <br />solution is near normal. The (C03 -2) anion in the calcite goes in solution to replace the <br />sulfate. Calcium stays as a solid in the new gypsum produced. Overall, the net change to the <br />water quality is not significant as compared to overburden water, but some pyrite has been <br />converted to other solid compounds: gypsum and iron oxides such as limonite. Strong support <br />for this occurring is seen in the water quality comparison of underburden and overburden <br />water to spoil water. Well GW-N40, which is southwest of the Phase 3 reclaimed area, best <br />represents the spoil water. Well GW-N44, west of the New Horizon #2 Mine, shows the water <br />quality of ground water in undisturbed overburden. Table 5 shows the comparative chemistry <br />of the spoil ground water (GW-N40) and the overburden ground water (GW-N44). <br />If the pyrite breakdown were occurring without any neutralization, the pH of the spoil water <br />would be lower than overburden water. This has not occurred, and as can be seen in the <br />following water data, the presence of all salts is lower in the spoil ground water. This is also <br />reflected in the lower TDS of the spoil water. <br />TABLE 5 <br />Wa+nr nnali+?? rnmr?arienn - Unrlarhnrrlan Wa+Pr !f_W-Nddl ve Cnnil Water ((iW-N,10) <br />Sample <br />Date Average 2005 Average 2006 Average 2007 Average 2008 Annual <br />Average <br />Parameter GW- <br />N44 GW- <br />N40 GW- <br />N44 GW- <br />N40 GW- <br />N44 GW- <br />N40 GW- <br />N44 GW- <br />N40 GW- <br />N44 GW- <br />N40 <br />Sulfate 2810 1875 2507.5 1880 2535 1842.5 2610 1812.5 2671 1845 <br />Magnesium 404.8 164.5 364.3 167.5 358.5 199.8 379.5 183.8 382.2 147.7 <br />Iron total 0.3 0.07 U 0.04 U A.08 U <0.04 0.1 <0.04 <br />Bicarbonate 442.8 365 419.5 409.3 420.8 318.8 407.5 331.8 413.9 355.6 <br />Calcium 427.8 578.5 439.3 573.5 426 530.3 428.5 517.8 432.1 465.3 <br />TDS 4620 3210 4142.5 3162 4170 3112.5 4362 3045 4383 3073 <br />pH 7.0 7.2 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.2 7.1 7.0 7.1 <br />9 SL-12 DRAFT 20AUG10.wpd 41
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.