Laserfiche WebLink
PERMIT #: M-1987-079 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: JLE <br />INSPECTION DATE: August 16, 2010 <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This was a normal monitoring inspection of the Lamar Pit, File No. M-1987-079; operated by All Rite Paving and Redi <br />Mix, Inc. This site is located one mile north of Lamar, Colorado in Prowers County. I, Jared Ebert of the Colorado <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (Division) conducted the inspection. Mr. Herb Pearson of All Rite Paving <br />and Redi Mix accompanied me on the inspection. <br />This is a 112c mining operation with 39.3 permitted acres. This site is split up into three distinct areas; a <br />processing/stockpiling area, and the Phase 1 and Phase 2 mining areas. The processing area is an industrial site used to <br />manufacture asphalt and concrete, the reclamation plan indicates this area will remain operational after the site has been <br />mined and reclaimed. The Operator has wet mined and created a 4.5 acre ground water pond in the Phase 1 mining area <br />based on a measurments taken from a 2009 aerial photograph of the site. It appears the site has not been actively mined <br />since 2001. No mining appears to have occurred in the Phase 2 mining area. This area is primarily vegetated with grasses <br />and trees, and a road traverses the site. The Phase 2 mining area is separated by the Phase 1 mining area by an <br />underground gas line. <br />The required mine entrance sign was not posted at the entrance of the mining operation, and many of the permit boundary <br />markers appeared to be missing. This issue is cited as a problem at the beginning of this report and will require <br />corrective action to be taken by the Operator. <br />The side slopes above the water line of the current pit excavation are fairly steep, approximately ranging from a 2:1 to <br />2.5:1 horizontal to vertical ratio. The topsoil stripped from the site appears to be located in two piles; one is along the <br />southern permit boundary line and east of the pond, and another stockpile is located north of the pond. <br />As stated above, the Division estimates there is approximately 4.5 acres of exposed groundwater at the site. Because <br />exposed groundwater results in out-of-priority water depletions, operations which expose groundwater must also <br />eventually obtain a water-court approved augmentation plan. Currently the Operator has not demonstrated to the <br />Division that they have obtained a permanent augmentation plan, nor do they hold a financial warranty to provide an <br />alternative method to mitigate injurious stream depletions that result from mining-related exposure of ground water. The <br />Division has statutory duty to ensure that operators have sufficient bonding to achieve reclamation. In order to assist <br />operators in achieving compliance with the requirements, the Division proposes that, by April 30, 2011, All Rite Paving <br />and Redi Mix, Inc. should contact the Division and agree upon a plan for achieving compliance with state water laws and <br />providing a sufficient bond to address the exposed ground water. <br />The Division has identified four approaches for operators to address this issue: <br />1.) File a financial warranty that will ensure backfilling of the pit to cover the exposed ground water to a depth of two <br />feet above the static ground water level or, <br />2.) Obtain a court approved augmentation plan for the current and future proposed exposed groundwater. <br />3.) File a financial warranty to cover the cost of installing a clay liner or slurry wall that meets the Division of Water <br />Resources requirement for preventing groundwater exposure or, <br />4.) Obtain approval from the Division of Water Resources that acknowledges compliance with the SEO's <br />requirements pursuant to §37-90-137 (11). <br />Enclosed with this report is a letter All Rite Paving and Redi Mix, Inc. should have received in regard to this issue. The <br />Division recommends the Operator read this letter in its entirety. Failure to address this issue may result in a possible <br />violation, corrective actions and civil penalties. <br />Finally, the Division observed the Operator backfilling the southern pond slope with concrete material. It appears the <br />Operator washes out concrete mixing trucks and dumps the wash water and concrete onto the pit slopes. This material <br />subsequently flows into the pit and comes into contact with the groundwater. During the conversion process in 1994, the <br />Division approved the concrete backfilling operation. However, at this time in accordance with Rule 3.1.5 (9) of the <br />Construction Materials Rules and Regulations, if an operator intends on using structural fill as backfill material, the <br />Page 2 of 5