Laserfiche WebLink
Comments Submitted by Denver Water <br />August 20, 2010 <br />its monitoring data with the Division. We also ask that the permit identify the entity (the <br />EPA, DBMS, WQCD, or the permittee) that will be responsible for notification of non- <br />compliance to water systems and that such periods of non-compliance be communicated to <br />Denver Water, the City of Arvada, the North Table Mountain Water and Sanitation District <br />and Jefferson County. <br />Denver Water appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments to the Division. <br />It is critical that Denver Water be able to assess the adequacy of reclamation and to monitor <br />pollutant sources, including the discharge of the remedial treatment system(s) in an effort <br />to determine the impacts of Schwartzwalder Mine to our water facilities. As mentioned <br />previously, the potential health risk to our customers could be significant. <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Thomas C. Mountfort <br />Environmental Compliance Supervisor <br />Cc: Mr. Jim McCarthy, City of Arvada <br />Mr. Rick Jeschke, North Table Mountain WSD <br />./David Berry, DRMS <br />Attachment A: Friends of Pinto Creek v. United States Environmental Protection Agency <br />Attachment B: Diagram of Pollutant Sources <br />Attachment C: Additional Comments on CO-0001244 <br />Enclosure: Schwartzwalder Mine Environmental Protection Plan (Revised Plan), <br />prepared by Whetstone Associates, July 31, 2010 <br />Page 8 of 8