My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-08-23_INSPECTION - C1981019
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2010-08-23_INSPECTION - C1981019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:19:47 PM
Creation date
8/24/2010 8:30:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
8/23/2010
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Colowyo Coal Mine
Inspection Date
8/18/2010
Email Name
JRS
KAG
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 18, 2010 C-1981-019/Colowyo Coal Mine S <br />accordance with the approved plan with regard to the channel width, side slopes, depth, and channel lining. <br />- The inspection proceeded to the lower portion of the East Pit Ditch in an area also reclaimed during 2009. This <br />portion of permanent ditch is constructed in the approved location as shown on approved Map 41. However, <br />oversized riprap and poor ditch shape precluded meaningful flow within the ditch itself. Side cutting of the ditch <br />was noted in numerous locations in the lower 500 feet of this ditch. The approved ditch designs for this ditch are <br />found in Exh. 7-14D of the approved permit application and require a 10 foot bottom width with 3H:1 V side <br />slopes and 15-21 inch average riprap. Field inspection found most of the ditch to be a long "mound" of very large <br />rock, some approaching 10 feet in length, 3 feet in width and three feet in thickness. Given the poor shape and <br />construction of this section of ditch, flow within the boundaries of the ditch cannot be anticipated in the future <br />with any certainty, especially when additional upstream areas are reclaimed in the future. The operator has failed <br />to construct the 2009 portion of the East Pit Ditch in accordance with the approved plan with regard the channel <br />width, side slopes, depth, and channel lining. This ditch segment is included in NOV CV-2010-004. <br />(***See Pictures 4 and 5***) <br />-The Section 28 Pond was compared to the as-built construction plate dated 27 November 2007. The pond was <br />found dry and access to the primary riser was good. The riser was measured for diameter, elevation of weep holes, <br />presence of a trash rack and anti-vortex device, dewatering gate (found closed), emergency spillway depth, width, <br />and riprap lining, presence and level of measuring flume, and embankment conditions. The pond was found in <br />excellent condition and all measurements were confirmed as depicted on the as-built. <br />- The Prospect Pond below the East Pit was also visited during the inspection. The pond held some water but the <br />level was below the lowest weep hole on the primary riser. Some seepage was entering the pond and the <br />conductivity was measured at 2,700 umhos/cm with a hand held pen meter. This is indicative of spoil spring flow, <br />probably from a small spoil aquifer in the east end of the East Pit. Highway 13 is immediately below this pond <br />embankment. Flow from the primary spillway passes under the pond through a 24-inch corrugated metal culvert. <br />Potential flow through the emergency spillway would pass through a 30-inch culvert. Some sediment was noted in <br />the 24-inch culvert and the operator should consider cleanout of this culvert in the near future to restore full <br />function. <br />- West Taylor Pond was also inspected and compared to the as-built construction plate dated 20 October 2007. <br />Water was discharging from the pond but the water level was approximately four feet below the weep holes. <br />There should be no water discharging from the pond when the water is below the weep holes so, obviously, there <br />is a problem with the riser or culvert through the embankment (or both) that will need to be fixed. Colowyo will <br />need to either drain the water from the pond through the gated pipe or pump the water out of the pond. All <br />applicable NPDES standards and Colowyo CDPS discharge permit requirements must be met when performing <br />the pond draining. Based on the inflow to the West Taylor Pond (from the A-A' and B-B' underdrains of the West <br />Taylor Fill), Colowyo may also need to temporarily block the West Taylor Pond as the maintenance is performed. <br />The pond discharge was clear and the EC was measured by the operator at 832 umhos/cm and by the DRMS at <br />900 umhos/cm (accurate to within 100 umhos). The pond was leaking and is in violation of Rule 4.05.6(2), <br />requiring the pond be "designed, constructed and maintained in compliance with 4.05.6 and 4.05.9. The West <br />Taylor Pond is included in NOV CV-2010-004. <br />- The Taylor Tributary Ditch is located on the west side of the mined in the 2009 West Pit reclamation block <br />above the East Taylor Pond. The operator is actively reclaiming in this area and was replacing topsoil side slopes <br />in the 2010 reclamation block at the time of the inspection. A notable change in construction technique was <br />observed at approximately station 15+00 to approximately 25+00 (stations shown on approved Map 41). In this <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 2 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 0 <br />Page 4 of 14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.