My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-08-10_REVISION - C1981008 (13)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-08-10_REVISION - C1981008 (13)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:17:43 PM
Creation date
8/18/2010 5:18:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/10/2010
Doc Name
Response 4 Revised Section 2.05.6(3)
From
Western Fuels-Colorado
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
For the New Horizon site, the USGS study methodology can be used as a basis to predict the time <br />frames of slightly elevated TDS in the spoil water. <br />The New Horizon Mines are similar to the Seneca II Mine in terms of depositional history and <br />observed spoil leachate chemistry. These similarities indicate the oxidation of pyrite can be <br />assumed to be the main source of increased TDS in spoil aquifer water at New Horizon, as at <br />Seneca II Mine. <br />The pyritic sulfur content in New Horizon's spoil averaged 0.52% (by weight) in the 72 overburden <br />core samples whose analyses are reported in the permit application. Pyrite is 53% sulfur (by <br />weight); therefore, the 0.52% pyritic sulfur content indicates that pyrite comprises roughly 0.98% <br />of the mass of the subject mine's spoil. Applying Williams and Clark's 1,600 year exhaustion time <br />for 1.0% pyrite, the subject mine's spoil can be expected to generate high sulfate concentrations <br />for at least 1,500 years. <br />The calculated 1,600 year duration is reduced to about 800 years when reductions are taken into <br />account for piping through the spoil (assumed to be 25 %) and lower annual precipitation (12 inches <br />at New Horizon versus 17 inches at Seneca). The calculated 800 -year duration is not meant to be <br />a precise prediction of the duration of elevated dissolved solids, but indicates the elevated solids <br />can be expected to last, possibly, several centuries. <br />The New Horizon Mine has two significant differences to the results observed at Seneca II. First, <br />the calcite present in the spoil at New Horizon seems to react with acid produced by the oxidation <br />of pyrite and take a substantial amount of sulfate from solution into solid calcium sulfate. This <br />keeps the dissolved solids content somewhat constant no matter how high or low the the inflow <br />water quality is with regard to TDS. Second, the Seneca II site is a dryland reclaimed area where <br />the only recharge into the spoil is a minor amount from precipitation and seepage from the <br />underburden aquifers. Total measured discharge from the spoil was only 3" per year. The New <br />Horizon Mine is principally irrigated with water of very good quality over a large portion of the year. <br />As described earlier, this results in a total movement through the spoil of approximately 16" per <br />year. Since the amount of water moving through the New Horizon spoil is so much greater, it <br />should oxidize the pyrite much more rapidly and also flush other salts which are contributing to the <br />increase in TDS at a much higher rate. For this reason, a ratio of the discharge at both sites could <br />be used to predict the time frame of slightly elevated spoil water quality. This ratio - 3'716 ", as <br />applied to 1500 years results in a time frame of 280 years until all the pyrite is oxidized. When <br />considering all the variables involved, this means that it could dissipate within a range of 100 to 500 <br />REVISED August 2010 2.05.6(3) -37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.