Laserfiche WebLink
a) the uniform distribution of calcite in the replaced spoil, <br />b) the higher transmissivity of the spoil to allow irrigation water with higher levels of oxygen to move <br />quickly through the spoil, resulting in faster breakdown of the pyrite in the spoil, <br />c) high void channels developing in the spoil at the bottom of the pit which may serve as the <br />primary conduit for flow in the spoil, <br />d) the quantity of calcite available in the areas needed most, <br />e) other chemistry which may influence the neutralization reactions. <br />For these reasons, there is a possibility that water leaching through the spoil may result in a higher <br />level of TDS for some period of time, until pyrite in the overburden spoil is fully oxidized and <br />removed. This was found to occur at the Seneca II Coal Mine in northwest Colorado and was the <br />subject of a study by the USGS in 1994. Sampling data gathered through the last 13 years at the <br />New Horizon Mine suggests that some pyrite is oxidizing but is being neutralized, as described <br />below. <br />The analysis of geochemical controls on groundwater quality at the New Horizon #1 Mine spoil <br />suggests that the water chemistry and concentrations of most elements of concern are controlled <br />by mineralogic reactions that will resist changes in water chemistry. It appears that any pyrite <br />(FeS oxidation gets neutralized by calcite (CaCO present in the same spoil material. This <br />results in the iron precipitating as iron oxides. The slightly higher than normal pH of the natural <br />water means that there is sufficient acid - neutralizing ions such as hydroxyl (OH -) or bicarbonate <br />(HCO3) in solution to absorb the acidic hydrogen (H +) ions produced by the pyrite oxidation. <br />Soluble sulfate (SO 2 ) ions are also produced by the pyrite oxidation, and they are quickly taken <br />up by the calcite to produce calcium sulfate or gypsum (CaSOA which is not very soluble and also <br />precipitates out of solution, especially when the pH of the solution is near normal. The (CO -z ) <br />anion in the calcite goes in solution to replace the sulfate. Calcium stays as a solid in the new <br />gypsum produced. Overall, the net change to the water quality is not significant as compared to <br />overburden water, but some pyrite has been converted to other solid compounds: gypsum and iron <br />oxides such as limonite. Strong support for this occurring is seen in the water quality comparison <br />of overburden water to spoil water. Well GW -N9 is north of the mined areas of New Horizon #1 and <br />has been unaffected by the mine since the flow gradient is to the southwest. This well is best to use <br />in the comparison. Spoil Spring 1, which developed near the southwestern end of the reclaimed <br />mine best represents the spoil water. Table 2.05.6.(3) -2 shows the chemistry of these waters <br />sampled at the same time. <br />REVISED August 2010 2.05.6(3) -28 <br />