My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-08-10_REVISION - C1981008 (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-08-10_REVISION - C1981008 (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:17:43 PM
Creation date
8/18/2010 5:18:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/10/2010
Doc Name
Response 4 Revised Section 2.05.4(2)(d)
From
Western Fuels-Colorado
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The actual maximum acceptable salt level, measured by Electrical Conductivity, will depend on <br />the plant species proposed in the revegetation plan and the potential for upward salt movement. <br />As pointed out in the report in Attachment 2.05.4(2)(d) -1, Dave Dearstyne of the NRCS said <br />that a level of 6.0 in the subsoil would not be detrimental to grasses or alfalfa. A study done by <br />Curtis Swift, PhD, of Colorado State University (Attachment 2.05.4(2)(d) -2), titled Salt <br />Tolerance of Various Temperate Zone Ornamental Plants, shows that alfalfa handles a soil <br />conductivity of 4 -8 mmhos /cm. The specific species cited is Medicago Sativa, which is exactly <br />the same as that prescribed in the revegetation plan for irrigated cropland. Also, this reference <br />does not differentiate between topsoil and subsoil. Based on this data, and NRCS <br />recommendations, the limits for Electrical Conductivity are shown in Table 2.05.4(2)(d) -1 and 2, <br />for the various topsoil and subsoil types. The averages will be reported for each landowner in <br />the Soil Sampling Report. <br />Specific level depends upon clay mineralogy, soil texture, and saturation percentage according <br />to Dollhopf et al., 1983. <br />The specific percentage of clay or sand allowed will depend upon clay mineralogy, organic <br />matter content, consistence, soil lift, spoil characteristics, and size of sand fraction. <br />These values may vary depending upon the plant species proposed for revegetation in specific <br />locations (e.g., a soil with a high coarse fragment content throughout its profile may be <br />completely salvaged if used for rangeland versus cropland postmine land use). Prime farmland <br />Lift A Topsoil will not have >10% cobbles and boulders (3 inches mean diameter and greater) <br />and 15% coarse fraction (caught in a 2 millimeter sieve) by volume. The cobbles and boulders <br />% is estimated visually (by volume) using standard charts while looking at the replaced soil <br />profile or a sample of the material in the profile <br />The prime farmland Lift B Topsoil criteria and single lift criteria were developed in conjunction <br />with Dave Dearstyne of the NRCS. <br />Revised PR 06 June 10 2.05.4(2)(d) -9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.