Laserfiche WebLink
Table 3 - Spoil/ Substitute Lift B Sample Results, Jul 15, 2010 <br /> <br />Sample <br />Depth <br />(inches) <br />Texture <br />(Lambert) Gravel <br /> <br />(2mm-3") <br />(Lambert) %Cobbles <br /> <br />(3"-10") (this <br />study) %Stones <br /> <br />(10"-25") <br />(this study) /°°Rock <br /> <br />Frag's <br />SS-31 0-36 SL 12 2 0 14 <br />SS-32A 0-36 SCL 10 2 0 12 <br />SS-33 0-36 SCL 15 0 0 15 <br />SS-34 0-36 SCL 31 2 2 35 <br />SS-35 0-36 SCL 15 2 0 17 <br />SS-36 0-36 SCL 22 7 0 29 <br />SS-37 0-36 SL 16 5 0 21 <br />SS-38 0-36 SL 16 3 0 19 <br />SS-39 0-36 SL 14 2 0 16 <br />SS-40 0-36 SL 0 0 0 0 <br />SS-41 0-36 SL 22 5 0 27 <br />SS-42 0-36 SCL 12 5 0 17 <br />SS-43 0-36 SCL 18, 1 2 21 <br />SS-44 0-36 CL 19 2 0 21 <br />Average 16 3 0 19 <br />Suitabili " Max 35% one location; <25% ave <br />Notes: Soils compared to the USDA Soil Classification System; refer to this system for definition of terms and abbreviations <br />Suitability based on Table 2.05.4(2)(d)-1 Spoil and Soil Suitability Criteria <br />* All soil types are acceptable except for s, Is, sc, sic, & c. <br />Texture based on Lambert grain size analysis compared to USDA Texture Triangle chart and verified in field <br />No boulders were observed in any soil pit; as such they are not shown in this table. <br />Coarse fragment values are based on visual estimate of cobble and stone volume and on sieve volume of gravel. <br />% gravel taken from Lambert and Associates (2010) and verified in the field. <br />Topsoil not present in this area. <br />0-36-inch depth selected to match Lambert and Associates (2010) sample depths.