Laserfiche WebLink
approximately 35 mg/L. See Whetstone Report at p. 9-43. That is more than 1000 <br />times the state water quality standard of 0.03 mg/L. <br />As set forth below, Cotter agrees there is a hydraulic connection between the <br />mine pool and Ralston Creek. Ralston Creek flows into Ralston Reservoir, one of the <br />primary water sources for residents of Denver and Arvada. The mine itself is located <br />.06 miles from Ralston Creek and 1.92 miles from Ralston Reservoir. Whetstone <br />Report at p. 8-1. Given the contaminants in the mine pool, the pool's hydraulic <br />connection to Ralston Creek and that the creek flows into a drinking water source, <br />there must be certainty in the corrective actions imposed to address the violations. <br />Dewatering the mine pool provides that certainty. <br />In its EPP and its Technical Memo, Cotter acknowledges that the mine pool <br />has a hydraulic connection to the alluvium. Technical Memo at p. 2 and footnote 1 <br />and Whetstone Report at pp. 7-3, 8-37, 8-41, 9-4, 9-5,15-2 and 15-10. Cotter <br />theorizes based on a conceptual model that has not yet been tested by monitoring, that <br />the hydraulic connection between the mine pool and the creek is weak and any flow <br />from the mine pool is low. Id. Cotter states, however, that the mine pool may <br />contribute up to 8% of the chemical load discharging into the alluvial ground water. <br />Id. <br />Moreover, Cotter cannot state with certainty whether the mine pool is <br />connected to Ralston Creek by any other pathway than the alluvial ground water. <br />Thus, Cotter's plan to treat alluvial water would not be sufficient since it would not <br />capture mine water discharges at other locations. For example, as Cotter <br />acknowledges, there are 33 boreholes that Cotter drilled into the valley floor that <br />Cotter cannot locate and does not know whether such boreholes were properly <br />plugged. Whetstone Report at p. 9-5. Cotter theorizes that "Flow from boreholes and <br />fractures is believed to be low based on mixing calculations...." Id. <br />In addition, the Schwartz trend intersects Ralston Creek about 1,900 feet from <br />the mine and is characterized by brittle fracturing and is the primary host for uranium. <br />Whetstone Report at p. 8-32. This trend has a measurable effect on electrical <br />conductivity in Ralston Creek. Id. However, Cotter states that because no electrical <br />conductivity survey exists prior to mining or during mining operations, Cotter does <br />not know whether water in the flooded underground mine is influencing water quality <br />in Ralston Creek at the Schwartz Trend intersection or whether the Schwartz trend <br />always discharged water with higher TDS than the creek in this location. Whetstone <br />Report at pp., 8-32, 33 and 41. <br />` Cotter's EPP lists a number of constituents that are far above Colorado groundwater standards: Total <br />Dissolved Solids are near 3,300ms* [; molybdenum is 1.45 mg/L. and total radium 2-16 is 175 pCiA., <br />Whetstone Report at p. 9-34. <br />10