Laserfiche WebLink
30. The Operator introduced several examples of flooding mines as a remediation <br />strategy. However, the Division rebutted these examples with additional data showing that <br />water treatment at the various flooded mines was still necessary. The Operator cites the <br />Lokken Mine in Norway saying that "water quality improved considerably when the mine <br />was flooded after partial closure." (June 25, 2010 Rationale for Not Conducting Mine <br />Dewatering and Mine Water Treatment at the Schwartzwalder Mine, by Susan Wyman, p. 7, <br />citing a 1997 article.) However, the Division cites more recent information noting that by <br />2009 the situation at the Lokken Mine had deteriorated. "A plan of action dating from 1992 <br />has become obsolete and new initiatives are needed immediately to save a river." <br />(Division's power point presentation, citing the Norwegian Institute for Water Research, <br />2009). <br />31. The Operator also testified that dewatering the mine poses substantial <br />challenges because the mine is no longer operable, access is difficult, and drilling to access <br />the mine pool poses significant challenges. However, the Division proposed alternative <br />methods and equipment including lowering a pump inside a casing string and using <br />centralizers to minimize hanging inside the casing. The Division also proposed exploring the <br />possibility of placing the pump in shaft no. 2, which bottoms at 800 feet below the Steve <br />Level. In addition, the Division supplied many examples of successful drilling to intercept <br />small targets. Drilling can be accomplished when encountering void space. And finally, the <br />Operator can refurbish and repair the mine, including installing ventilation, to make the mine <br />safe to enter. <br />32. At the hearing the Division described the mine pool as "a 144 million gallon <br />tank of water containing 42,000 lbs. of uranium, perched 500 feet above and less than two <br />miles from Ralston Reservoir." Also, Denver Water and Arvada Water are currently bearing <br />the costs of treating the water contaminated by Cotter. The Division considers the costs of <br />the corrective actions less than the costs of cleaning the water in Ralston Creek and <br />Reservoir. <br />33. Ralston Creek flows into Ralston Reservoir. Ralston Reservoir provides <br />drinking water to Denver and Arvada. The Operator is responsible for the increased uranium <br />in Ralston Creek through the alluvial fill and mine pool. The mine pool is contributing to the <br />contamination of Ralston Creek and Reservoir. The mine pool is affecting the hydrologic <br />balance of the affected land and surrounding area. The mine pool could significantly <br />negatively impact water quality in Ralston Creek and Reservoir. Dewatering the mine pool <br />to a level below the level of Ralston Reservoir will ensure that the hydraulic gradient is again <br />reversed away from Ralston Creek and Reservoir - by recreating a cone of depression. <br />Protecting the water in Ralston Creek and Reservoir is essential. Dewatering the mine will <br />be expensive. However, the benefit (protecting Denver and Arvada's drinking water supply) <br />justifies the expense. <br />Cotter Corp. <br />Schwartzwalder Mine 6 <br />M-1977-300 <br />MV-2010-018