My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-08-05_REVISION - C1981008 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-08-05_REVISION - C1981008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:17:33 PM
Creation date
8/9/2010 12:44:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/5/2010
Doc Name
Faxed Letter from Turner
From
JoEllen Turner
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
DAB
SB1
MLT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Y. RU 1 e 2.04. 10 <br />There.are several areas within the Vegetation Information and Revs etatf n <br />sections where clarifications need to be made. These include past--mining land <br />use, success standards, proposed seed mix, and pest control plan, to name a.i <br />few. <br />Rule 2.04.11 <br />Updated letters from the Colorado Department of Wildlife and the U.S. Fish and <br />I4`1ldilfe-Service concerning any threatened or endangered species should be <br />included in this section. <br />Rule 2-04.12 <br />reviously under this section QwAe e) Prime Farmland had <br />been en : ed in the area., e.stern Fuels now claims that no prime arm an <br />e flit-Tn-f e ned. T 5 G in a etter <br />167y ou er 14. 1992. a letter states a it <br />rr Qate- w t a eeen .a e s v <br />water and er ore a un <br />so an vegetation sections <br />wnoie issue ciarified before appr <br />Rule 2.45.3(3) <br />at mere is not a t <br />e. arrever, roug ou a -wr sous <br />s referenCBS'are ma efi A'i''-'T dfld <br />o e ac that some sa s may not e <br />ness a etc. Based on fhb con'Ti'i`rtfr+g <br />1s) w nee to be a resse n e <br />Page 6: The rill and gully plan appears to onky apply to Pond 007. Is this <br />the intent. or does the plan apply to the entire mine site? <br />Page 7: The information for the 10 year, 25 year, and 100 year storm events <br />are incorrect- They should read 2.0, 2.4 and 3.0 respectively, Note, the <br />designs for Pond 047 had the correct storm event amounts. <br />Page 11: The haul road designs from.the old Peabody permit should be included <br />in the permit. <br />Page 18: Mining within 100 feet of a public road right of way requires <br />special permits, however, no such permits are included. The mining through <br />County Road 5 was approved by the county for Peabody, and subsequently to <br />Western Fuels as successor, therefore Attachment K of Tab 13 from Peabody's <br />old permit should be included in this permit. <br />Rule 2.05.4(2)(c) <br />Pages 5 & 6: The designs of the reclaimed channel has used the incorrect 10 <br />year, 24 hour storm event of 1.6 inches. The correct figure is 2.0 inches, <br />therefore, the ditch will have to be redesigned.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.