My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-08-05_REVISION - C1981008 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-08-05_REVISION - C1981008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:17:33 PM
Creation date
8/9/2010 12:44:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/5/2010
Doc Name
Faxed Letter from Turner
From
JoEllen Turner
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
DAB
SB1
MLT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r Q?C <br />Divitsion of Realion, Mining, and Safetyt`i <br />1313 Sherman Street Room 215 SAN41Q `?'? ` 0 <br />Demrer, Co. 802+03 <br />January 24, 2010 tab" of ?' <br />Dear Sandy, ]vlarcia, NW Dan <br />We are ob ecdng to the Permit,Rerwwal#5,'s well as TR49, and 777 <br />T" T, we with-drew ow objection a year ago based on the informs on that WFC and DRMS <br />presented us with. In my letter, however, I left the option of objecting at a later dam orate I saw <br />the entire picture. You may read my letter again, and you will sea that is vAW it said. We were <br />given a letter from WFC stating that the .entire 107 acres would be pw back in the prime <br />farmland, irrigated crops as it was prior to them mining it. We were also given a document that <br />stated thst WFC would 8dttresa that in 30-45 days. TIM was August of 20118_ Wowl That was a <br />long time ago and none of these things happened- If you r+ernernler, ALL of you agreed to that <br />and ALL of you got the same letters. <br />So, that coven our objection to this pwrait Renewal which was also in my objection at that time <br />and now, we are r o-mtaring those objections. <br />As w TR49. We now saw a public notice or anything coacaing it, but Marcia tells us and the <br />court house tells us that this was the revision that changed the Malin place from irrigated pmure <br />to dry land. We therefore are objecting to this bec mw first off' I believe that this should have <br />been a permit revisko. opened fow discussion because it changes the pERl4t11"'I'I O from wbat it <br />was to DRYLAND. This was not just a MINOR theme as it states in the laves to allow a <br />technical revision. Second, the property was all ivripted prior to the mane eateriing the pmperty. <br />This comes to mother issue. We lave kners from the MRCS that were used inappropriately. <br />And we have proof of that. Some of the letters that WFC used were for a specific piece <br />ground and most of thou letters are for a specific piece, but WFC has used these for <br />EVERY piece of properly dw they want changed and this is illegal. 'they are furnishiug you <br />with FALSE inIftmudon. "ey are furnishing Sam information for ALL the properties WEST <br />of 2700 road, also. <br />So, we are entertng nm objections ter, and if they cannot be entemd with you because of the <br />.i <br />time span, we will =Wed than with other a9OWies, AfterlookingattheLAND USE <br />being at the 0owt home, also, the permits wwere issued based on these properties S <br />anurned to AGRJCULTURAL USE, not DR"YLANI]. <br />JoEll?nar
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.