Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Protection Plan, Schwartzwalder Mine 14-3 <br />• on these theses results, material in the East and West Waste Rock Piles, and the fill adjacent to Ralston <br />Creek have low potential to generate acidic drainage. <br />Table 143. Summary of Acid-Base Accounting Results <br />Years <br />Depth ANP AGP NNP <br />Sample Location eft) Exposed to t CaC03/kt t CaCO3/kt t CaC03/kt ANP/AGP <br />Weathering <br />North Waste Rock Pile <br />• <br />South End, Central Bench 1.5 <1* 214 8 206 28.5 <br />South End, Central Bench 6 10-17 175 23 152 7.5 <br />South End, Central Bench 11 10-17 179 14 165 12.7 <br />North End, Central Bench 1.7 <1* 188 8 180 22.7 <br />North End, Central Bench 6 10-17 123 38 86 3.3 <br />North End, Central Bench 11.5 10-17 160 22 138 7.4 <br />South Waste Rock Pile <br />* = moved in six months prior to ABA testing <br />North End, Top 1.5 15-17 186 29 158 6.5 <br />North End, Top 6 15-17 162 38 124 4.3 <br />North End, Top 10.5 15-17 174 33 141 5.3 <br />South End, Top 1 13-18 229 28 201 8.2 <br />South End, Toe 2.5 13-15 157 68 89 2.3 <br />Average 177 28 149 10 <br />(iii)Acid Consumption Tests <br />An evaluation of the potential for acid-leach reprocessing of the waste rock piles was performed in 1986 by <br />Colorado School of Mines Research Institute (Chlumsky, 1986). Results of the study indicated that the <br />acid consumption per ton of waste rock was between 400 and 420 pounds of sulfuric acid. This <br />neutralizing potential is equivalent to about 160 t CaC03/kt assuming 40% solution of sulfuric acid, and is <br />in good agreement with the results of ABA testing. <br />(iv) Impact Analysis <br />Waste rock from the mine was placed in two external dumps that are located adjacent to Ralston Creek <br />upstream of the mine (Figure 2-1). The stability of the waste rock piles was investigated by McDermid <br />(1983a, 1983b) and hydraulic control structures were constructed to protect the piles from the 100-year <br />flood event (Shepherd Miller, 1999). The control structures include an energy dissipater located in the <br />ephemeral drainage near the east waste rock pile and rip rap on the side slopes. Additionally, the waste <br />rock piles were recontoured to a stable 2H: IV slope configuration. <br />R.G. Otto & Associates (1984) performed a detailed survey of surface and groundwater quality to assess <br />the impact of runoff and seepage from the waste rock piles on the water quality in Ralston Creek. Surface <br />water samples were collected upstream and downstream of the waste rock piles and groundwater samples <br />were collected down-slope of the disposal site from September 1983 through August 1984. The study <br />concluded that the waste rock piles had no measurable impact on water quality in the stream, with the <br />possible exception of stream uranium levels. The uranium data were inconclusive for determining impact, <br />and the uranium levels in Ralston Creek downstream of the waste rock piles were below the Colorado <br />Basic Stream Standards. <br />Subsequent water quality monitoring on Ralston Creek from 1984 to 2009 has not indicated impacts to <br />• water quality in the creek. Laboratory data and the E.C. survey conducted in November 2008 (Section <br />8(e)(ii)) showed no impact from the waste rock piles on Ralston Creek (Figure 8-22). <br />4109C.100731 Whetstone Associates •