Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Protection Plan, Schwartzwalder Mine 11-11 <br />is detection (<1 mg/L) above the mine to about 0.3 mg/L below the mine. No surface water standard has been <br />established for molybdenum. <br />While the sumps and water treatment plant were operating, the increases in TDS, sulfate, magnesium, <br />sodium, uranium, and molybdenum as Ralston Creek passed the mine site were due to treated discharge, <br />which entered the creek at flow rates of 200 - 350 gpm (0.45 - 0.78 cfs). The discharge water contained <br />sulfate concentrations of about 500 mg/L, sodium concentrations of about 150 mg/L, and magnesium <br />concentrations of about 50 mg/L. Because uranium had been removed, the treated water may have been a <br />source of dilution for uranium concentrations in Ralston Creek during operations. <br />(ii) Water Quality After Turning off the Sumps and WTP <br />After the sumps were shut down and the water treatment plant stopped discharging, the major ion <br />concentrations have fluctuated in the creek near the mine site (Figure 11-4). When the plant and sumps <br />were first shut down, major ion and TDS concentrations increased for several months, then decreased to <br />about half the long-term average concentrations. The initial increase in uranium and major ions after the <br />sumps were shut down was due to a "first flush" phenomenon, as water in the sumps and alluvium came <br />into contact with Ralston Creek for essentially the first time. <br />Subsequent fluctuations in major ion and TDS concentrations result from seasonality, and shutting down <br />the Sump 1 recirculation. The effect of seasonality on water quality in Ralston Creek became even more <br />evident after the sumps and water treatment plant were shut down (Figure 11-2). The low concentrations in <br />Spring 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2009 are the result of seasonal flushing and dilution. The second (July <br />2003) and third (July 2005) increases in concentration also could have resulted from regular seasonal <br />variation in creek water quality, which was previously masked by discharge from the water treatment plant <br />into the Ralston Creek. <br />• Uranium concentrations followed the same trend as sulfate, bicarbonate, and TDS (Figure 11-5), indicating <br />that the processes that generate TDS in the creek (initial sump flushing, seasonality, and the Sump 1 recirc <br />shutdown) also control uranium. Uranium concentrations in 229 samples collected at Station SW-BPL <br />from January 1990 to June 2010 indicate distinct seasonality, with concentrations at their lowest in the <br />spring and highest in the winter. <br />Ralston Creek has been monitored for uranium at stations SW-AWD, SW-BPL, SW-ARH, and SW-LLHG <br />regularly for over 20 years. The results are shown graphically in Figure 11-7 through Figure 11-9. The <br />concentrations of uranium and other constituents in surface water from 1998 - 2010 were presented in <br />Table 11-7. Table 11-9 presents uranium data from 1990 - 2010. The highest uranium values were <br />observed (1) in January 2003, approximately six months after the sumps were initially shut down, when <br />creek flows were at their lowest, (2) in September 2008, approximately five months after the Sumpl <br />recirculation was shut down (again when creek flows were low), and (3) in September 2009 (again during <br />low-flow). <br />The source of uranium and TDS loading to the creek is derived from alluvium and fill, which may be both a <br />primary source (from slightly mineralized waste rock used as fill material) and a secondary source (from <br />historical pond leakage which impacted sediments and fill). Although the former storage pond and the ore <br />sorter area have been remediated to specified cleanup levels and reclaimed, the historical releases from <br />these facilities may have created a dispersed secondary source of loading to Ralston Creek. Partial source <br />removal is planned for 2010, as part of the RML decommissioning (Section 15) and additional mitigation <br />options are being considered for groundwater in the alluvium and fill, to ultimately protect water quality in <br />Ralston Creek. <br />• <br />4109C.100731 Whetstone Associates