My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-25_HYDROLOGY - M1977300
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1977300
>
2010-06-25_HYDROLOGY - M1977300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:13:55 PM
Creation date
8/3/2010 8:21:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
6/25/2010
Doc Name
Rationale for Not Conducting Mine Dewatering
From
Whetstone Associates, Inc.- Susan A. Wyman
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
DB2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
June 25, 2010 8 of 15 <br />"pump column" (a.k.a. "drop pipe") which is 3-inch diameter steel discharge pipe which threads into the <br />top of the pump. Each 10-ft segment of discharge pipe would weigh 79 pounds with couplings, for a total <br />weight of 3,950 pounds for all 50 pipe segments. A 600-ft reel of 0-gage insulated copper pump wire <br />would weigh 930 pounds. This equipment would have to be carried down the 45-degree slope of the <br />Sunshine raise. A pneumatic crane-like pulley system would have to be designed to hold the weight of the <br />pump column (pump, motor, discharge pipe, and electrical wire) as the pump was lowered into the shaft. It <br />is not clear that 10-ft of clearance exists in the old hoist room at the top of the shaft on the Steve Level. If <br />not, 5-ft joints of 3-inch drop pipe could be special ordered. In that case, 100 segments of pipe would need <br />to be connected as the pump was lowered into the shaft and the total weight would be greater (4,100 <br />pounds) due to additional couplings. Each joint or coupling represents a possible failure point. And <br />although the rock in the Schwartzwalder Mine is competent hard rock, there is no guarantee that the shaft <br />has remained (or will remain) open to that depth. <br />The second method would utilize a boom truck to install the pump through a hole drilled vertically into the <br />shaft from the hillside above the mine. The location of the shaft from the hillside would be difficult to <br />determine, and an underground survey would have to be conducted to tie in to the surface features (Figure <br />4). If the correct location could be identified, a drilling contractor would have to drill through 300 feet of <br />rock and open cavities without deviation to hit the 74-square foot target of the #2 Shaft (Figure 5). <br />Drilling through open cavities is often more difficult than drilling through competent rock, because there is <br />no hole to stabilize the bit and avoid deviation, and no means of flushing the hole to bring up cuttings from <br />around the bit. Without "return" of drill cuttings, a driller would be drilling blind into the rock below the <br />existing voids, with a high potential for getting the bit stuck in the hole. Few drillers may be willing to take <br />on this challenge, due to the high probability of damaging their equipment. If the hole could be <br />successfully drilled, steel casing would have to be set in the hole to keep the hole open and meet the <br />requirements of the Colorado well construction rules (2 CCR 402-2). Without a "bottom" of the hole, <br />sealing the annular space (as required by law) would be difficult. If well casing were successfully installed, <br />the pump could be set vertically from the surface, provided that the shaft remained open to a depth of 500 <br />feet below the Steve Level. Finally, a buried pipeline would have to be installed on the steep hillside <br />leading down to the water treatment plant.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.