My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-27_REVISION - M1980146
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980146
>
2010-07-27_REVISION - M1980146
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:44:17 PM
Creation date
7/30/2010 1:46:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980146
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
7/27/2010
Doc Name
Response to comment #6
From
Wasteline Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM4
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WASTELINE WC., <br />v P.O. Box 3471 Rapid City, SD 57709-3471 (605)348-0244 <br />??jj?j? ®?® PO Box 88 Cortez, CO 81321-0088 (970) 564-1380 CELL (605) 390-7255 <br />E-mail: WASTELINE6aaol.com or SDLiberty(n,aol.com <br />F`e ?aa` m <br />Our o?` °? a?`d ^ <br />27 July 2010 <br />Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety JUL 3 0 2010 <br />ATTN: Mr. Bob Oswald Dtv+ebn at Roc n, <br />691 CR 233, Suite A-2 1,onjN and Safa1"y <br />Durango, CO 81301 <br />SUBJECT: 112 PERMIT AMENDMENT #4 APPLICATION, FILE NO. M-1980-146 ?M-4- <br />RESPONSE- TO COMMENT #6 (26 JUL 2010) <br />Dear Mr. Oswald: <br />This letter is the response to the subject comment letter received electronically <br />yesterday. The corrected memorandum from the BLM will be submitted separately. <br />Otherwise, we believe that this letter and its attachments address all concerns in the <br />subject comment letter. <br />General: <br />As requested, the written scale shown on all revised maps has been removed, <br />and only the graphical scale is now shown. <br />The small signatures on several of the revised maps has been replaced by a <br />larger signature. <br />The permit number has been corrected where necessary. <br />The first page of the actual permit application form has been corrected to show <br />the new acreage, and is attached. <br />2. Exhibit D - Mining Plan (related to Exhibit C, Mining Maps): <br />Exhibit E - Reclamation Plan: <br />a. It is my professional opinion that there will be no offsite impacts to the <br />Crader Pit, provided that the mining and reclamation as described in <br />Exhibits C to F is performed as described. The material being mined is a <br />conglomerate which is stable at the natural slopes present in the vicinity, <br />and the proposed post-mining and post-reclamation slopes are flatter <br />than those naturally occurring on the site; so there are no "unstable <br />slopes" proposed - unless conditions are found to be much different than <br />those already found to the north and south of the boundary between the <br />two pits. <br />b. Since the logical method, as described, is to daylight between the two <br />pits, the slope of the area on both sides of the boundary will be NOT <br />STEEPER than the 3:1 shown on the mining maps in Exhibit C, and is <br />anticipated to be much flatter, although it is not possible at this time to <br />determine precisely what that grade will be. <br />C. Since the proposed grading of the southern portion of the Montoya Pit, as <br />shown in both the mining and reclamation plan, shows the entire mined
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.