My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-27_PERMIT FILE - M2009076 (23)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2009076
>
2010-07-27_PERMIT FILE - M2009076 (23)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:16:50 PM
Creation date
7/29/2010 2:59:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009076
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
7/27/2010
Doc Name
Adequacy Response- Ex. T- EPP
From
Venture Resources
To
DRMS
Email Name
ACS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Tailings Impoundment is to be built up in a series of benches, arranged in six different zones: Barrier Bench <br />and Bench #1- Bench #5. Each of these Benches are to be constructed using strict procedures as described in <br />Exhibit C, 6.3.3(2)(h). In these construction specifications, a beach width (LB, from embankment crest to ponded <br />water) shall be maintained to achieve a ratio of LB /h > 5, where LB is beach width and h is incremental embankment <br />lift height (typically, h = 10 feet). Considering the permeability relationships between the coarse and slimes <br />fractions (reported by TRI in the geoteclmical analysis attached in the appendix of Exhibit C), this beach length ratio <br />will provide for adequate control of the phreatic surface. This is acceptable, according to Vick's Planning, Design, <br />and Analysis of Tailings Danis, because this is the lowest allowable limit for this upstream method of impoundment <br />over an impermeable liner foundation. Embankment slope stability will be preserved and the phreatic surface will <br />not break out in the embankment face. <br />A schematic representation of the beach length/embankment height ratio as illustrated by Vick: <br />L <br />A-k, - tc L, 1H h - <br /> <br />Figure 8.3 Influence of beach width on phrealic surface for homogeneous, anisotropic up- <br />stream embankment on an impermeable foundation. <br />Vick, Steven G. Planning Design, and Analysis of Tailings Dams. Vancouver, B.C. Canada: <br />BiTech Publishers Ltd., 1990, p. 177. <br />• A freeboard reserve of 12 inches shall be maintained from the ponded process water elevation and the top of the <br />embankment crest elevation. In the event of a 100 year/24-hour storm, it can be expected that 3.8" of precipitation <br />will become captured and co-mingled with the ponded process water (run-off has been managed with a diversion <br />ditch network, see SWMP). Tlus will raise the ponded water elevation. Having 12 inches of freeboard will more <br />than adequately provide for the necessary storage volume; preventing overflow and embankment erosion. <br />To consider the Tailings Impoundment Water Balance and water storage values at each Bench, refer to the <br />spreadsheet analysis below: <br /> Tailings Impoundment Water Balance <br /> Bench Inflow/Outflow Area Amount Flow Totals <br /> (s . ft.) (in./yr.) (gpm) (gpin) <br /> Barrier now Total 31. <br /> Process Water from Mill - - - - 31.11 <br /> Direct Precipitation (avg.) 16,410 15.72 0.31 <br /> Stormwater Run-on 0 0.00 0.00 <br /> Out ow Total -31. <br /> Available Decant Water Recycle - - - - -24.66 <br /> Pan Evaporation (avg.) 16,410 38.00 -0.74 <br /> Seepage (2.05e-4 gpm/sq. ft.) - leachate <br />collected & recycled <br />16,410 <br />- - <br />-3.36 <br /> Void Space Entrainment - - - - -2.66 <br /> Direct Discharge - - - - 0.00 <br /> Total Available Reevele Water -28. <br />Page 8 of 31
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.