My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-27_PERMIT FILE - M2009076 (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2009076
>
2010-07-27_PERMIT FILE - M2009076 (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:16:50 PM
Creation date
7/29/2010 2:59:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009076
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
7/27/2010
Doc Name
Adequacy Response, Ex. C- Mining Plan
From
Venture Resources
To
DRMS
Email Name
ACS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />A schematic representation of the upstream placement method as illustrated by Vick: <br />sm'loll d T.ed;na; -- sw--•. 1... <br />p !A? <br />Decani I.eihilg5 diSChdrU+•' nI <br />(a) <br />Pe-i. is,.,,. <br />K;, <br />IN <br /> <br />(r) <br /> <br />0 <br />0 <br />W) <br />Figure 3.2 Sequential raising, upstream embankment. <br />Vick, Steven G. Planning Design, and Analysis of Tailings _Dams. Vancouver, B.C. Canada: <br />BiTech Publishers Ltd., 1990, p. 72. <br />Venture Resources has employed the expertise of TRI/Environmental, Inc, and Advanced Terra Testing, Inc. to <br />perform the necessary geotechnical laboratory work to examine the tailings' physical and engineering properties as <br />well as the interface relationship between the tailings, composite liner components, and the existing site conditions. <br />TRI's findings and reports can be found in entirety as an appendix to this Exhibit C. <br />Vick states in Planning, Design, and Analysis of Tailings Dams that the upstream method is particularly suitable <br />under the following conditions: <br />1. At least 40-60% sand in the whole of the tailings. This operation anticipates 541/o sand (see TRI's report on <br />dry mill tailing particle size analysis attached in the appendix of this Exhibit C). <br />2. Peripheral discharge and well controlled beach is necessary. This operation will utilize spigotting <br />discharge that can be adjusted to regulate embankment and beach formation. <br />3. Not suitable for significant water storage. This operation considers water an expensive operating medium <br />and must recycle readily and continually. Water is decanted from the ponding zone and collected from the <br />leachate sump. This recycled water is pumped to a Water Holding Pond above the Mobile Millsite for <br />storage. <br />4. Seismic resistance is poor. This operation is not in an area of any measurable degree of seismic activity. <br />5. Embankment raising rate less than 15-30 ft. per year most desirable, greater than 50 ft. per year can be <br />hazardous. This operation is well below this condition, averaging 10-12 ft. per year. <br />6. Embankment fill requirement of natural soil, sand tailings, or mine waste. This operation is processing <br />mine waste rock with a sand content of 54%. <br />Page 16 of 35
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.