My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-27_PERMIT FILE - M2009076 (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2009076
>
2010-07-27_PERMIT FILE - M2009076 (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:16:50 PM
Creation date
7/29/2010 2:59:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009076
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
7/27/2010
Doc Name
Adequacy Response, Ex. C- Mining Plan
From
Venture Resources
To
DRMS
Email Name
ACS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />100 <br />1. 't % 1 \ :Mn <br />\Cd <br />1 Zn` <br />`, <br />Cu <br />Fe <br />0 <br />w <br />75 <br />v7 <br />0 <br />F_ 50 <br />z <br />w <br />U <br />X <br />W 25 <br />0 <br />1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 <br />pH <br />FIGURE t. HEAVY METAL BEHAVIOR AS A FUNCTION OF PH IN ARGO WATER. <br />The EPA currently is doing extensive monitoring of ground water sources (as stated earlier, The Big Five Tunnel <br />drainage is monitored, collected, and pumped to the Argo Tunnel Treatment Facility located in Idaho Springs). <br />Proposed Point of Compliance: <br />• DRMS has determined that a practice based ground water protection plan be applied to this operation through the <br />implementation of a composite liner system under the Tailings Impoundment. Because of this, there will be no <br />ground water point of compliance or quality data proposed. <br />For education purposes the pre-existing, baseline quality of ground water beneath the proposed facility has been <br />provided. Please refer to "Explanation of Significant Differences Big Five Tunnel Discharge", attached at the end of <br />this Exhibit C. The Big Five Tunnel is within the vicinity beneath the proposed disposal area at a depth of <br />approximately 1,100 feet. The condition of the existing ground water (Table 1.0 in this publication) is significantly <br />worse than the mill process water (see lab analysis of proposed waste stream attached). <br /> <br />Page 14 of 35
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.