My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-17_REVISION - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-07-17_REVISION - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:16:22 PM
Creation date
7/26/2010 9:24:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/17/2010
Doc Name
Objection Letter(Faxed)
From
Western Fuels Colorado
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
DAB
SB1
MLT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1(x;..1-._ <br /> <br />97 <br /> <br /> <br />t._ `- 1...... ?........ _.. <br />J <br />that the DRMS negative determination, the procedures involved in PR 05, TR-57, <br />or any other relevant approval, or the reliance on the erroneous soil sample by <br />WFC and by DRMS, singly or collectively constitute a violation of any applicable <br />statutes, rules, or regulations. The ultimate source of the misidentification._of.the,,.,. <br />Prime Farmland-soils on the Morgan Property was a tvypogxap a "I?;e,rrovntri. a <br />govemmen#-published reference s6di°de tiI?fena t ?a.. <br />that was used by the consultant who completed the soil <br />?^survey in 1998. The 1998 soil survey reached conclusions that were consistent <br />with soil surveys also completed in 1988, 1992, and 1996 concerning the,-,s.4me <br />of <br />requirements- of the Colorado regulatory program, and that mining-'and <br />reclamation of the Morgan property located within the permit boundary has been <br />conducted in accordance with the approved permit" (Attachment 8 at page 2). <br />Comment No. 7: <br />2.04.3-6 What abandoned cropland? What abandoned irrigated cropland? <br />What abandoned irrigated Farmland.? <br />.,, rwesnerits WHAT A LIE. Another <br />cut to the farmer. They don't even know how hard we work to get these farms <br />in the conditions that they- were before the mine entered the properties. <br />Constant rock picking, Constant fertilizing, constant leveling and <br />culttpar_king, rotations, constant removing weeds and unwanted growths, <br />evert pastures require hours of maintenance. Constantly figidng rodents <br />and weevils and everything. <br />"Induced wheat grasses." <br />What: induced wheat grasses which are actually a, part of dryland mixes. Not <br />irrigated pastimes and haylands. <br />WFC Response, <br />Much of this comment is unintelligible, The comment regarding improvements <br />appears to rest orl a misunderstanding of the terms "improvements," which refers <br />only to not soil amendment or other farming practices, <br />Correctly interpreted, the statement on page 2.04.3 - 6 is accurate, <br />Comment No. 8: <br />2.04 3-7 "Historic land use." ALL ties 1.04(71) Land use Is what the Land is <br />used for NOT the vegetation cover. Most all of NH2 has been HISTORICALLY <br />used as cropland. 1.04($0) lands that have been used for cropland ANY 5 <br />out of 10 or more years preceding the acquisition 1.04(a) cropland is land
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.