My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-09_ENFORCEMENT - M1981185
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2010-07-09_ENFORCEMENT - M1981185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:15:19 PM
Creation date
7/15/2010 1:44:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
7/9/2010
Doc Name
Joint stipulation
From
MLRB
To
Wildcat Mining Corporation
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DECEIVED <br />JUL 15 2010 <br />Division of RscWms# n. <br />IYtlniN and *a#* <br />BEFORE THE MINED LAND RECLAMATION BOARD <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />JUL 0 9 2010 <br />Durango Field Office <br />Division of Reclamation, <br />Mining and Safety <br />IN THE MATTER OF WIP&T MINING CORPORATION, MAY DAY NNF, <br />PERMIT No. M-1981-185; Idaho Mill, File No. M-2006-069; and IDAHO MINE, File No. <br />M-2010-003 <br />JOINT STIPULATION TO ADDRESS ALL PENDING REGULATORY ACTIONS <br />The Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety ("Division"). and Wildcat Mining <br />Corporation ("Wildcat Mining") have discussed resolution of all pending matters <br />concerning the Idaho Mill, Idaho Mine and the May Day Mine. Based on the parties' <br />discussion, the parties hereby continue all pending regulatory actions with the following <br />conditions and understanding: <br />(1) The parties hereby continue the following regulatory actions that are currently <br />set for the Board's July 12, 2010 meeting to August 11, 2010 for a status update: <br />(a) Wildcat Mining continues its administrative appeal filed pursuant to Rule <br />1.4.11, regarding the Division's denial of Wildcat Mining's 110 application <br />for the Idaho Mine; <br />(b) Wildcat Mining continues its petition for declaratory order concerning the <br />Idaho Mine application; and, <br />(c) The Division continues its request for a bond forfeiture hearing regarding <br />the Idaho Mill interim bond.' <br />(d) The parties request that all regulatory actions described above be set for a <br />'Please note that prior to 2010 Wildcat Mining filed documents in which the site was called the Idaho Mill. On January <br />21, 2010, Wildcat Mining filed anew permit application and referred to the site as the Idaho Mine. Accordingly, <br />specific reference is made to the Idaho Mill and the Idaho Mine site, as well as the May Day Mine.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.