My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-15_REVISION - C1981028
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2010-07-15_REVISION - C1981028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:16:13 PM
Creation date
7/15/2010 12:33:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
7/15/2010
Doc Name
Letter Regarding 2009 Vegetation Monitoring Review
From
DRMS
To
Coors Energy Company
Type & Sequence
SL5
Email Name
RDZ
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />July 15, 2010 <br />Mr. Donald MacDonald <br />Coors Energy Company <br />P.O. Box 467 <br />Golden, CO 80402 <br />Re: Keenesburg Mine, Permit No. C-1981-028, SL-05 vegetation monitoring <br />Dear Mr. MacDonald: <br />COLORADO <br />D [ V I S I O N OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Mike King <br />Executive Director <br />Loretta E. Pineda <br />Director <br />Janet Binns of the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (Division) has reviewed the 2009 <br />Vegetation Monitoring report that is part of the SL-05 Phase II Bond Release Application. Per Ms. Binns <br />review, vegetation sampling of Area 23 did not meet sample adequacy per Rule 4.15.11(2). The Division <br />has identified three options to rectify this issue: <br />• Coors Energy Company (CEC) could respond with a letter discussing why CEC believes <br />sampling adequacy was in fact achieved. <br />• CEC could revise the bond release application to remove Area 23 from the application. <br />• CEC could resample Area 23, ensure that sampling adequacy is achieved, and (should the new <br />data still show that Area 23 meets the approved cover value) revise the application to submit the <br />new data. <br />CEC may also propose other solutions, which the Division will certainly consider. Please contact me if <br />you have any questions. <br />Sincerely, <br />Robert Zuber, P.E. <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Cc: Dan Hernandez, DRMS <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.