My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-13_PERMIT FILE - M2010049 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2010049
>
2010-07-13_PERMIT FILE - M2010049 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:16:02 PM
Creation date
7/14/2010 11:12:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2010049
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
7/13/2010
Doc Name
New 112c Appl.- Part 2, Ex. M- thru Ex. S
From
Varra Companies, Inc.
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Slope Stability Analysis <br />Varra Gravel Operation - Durham Pit <br />Greeley, Colorado <br />Page 3 <br />>dry density; <br />>direct shear strength; <br />?grain size distribution; <br />> liquid limit; and <br />?plasticity index. <br />Field observations and gradation test results indicate the majority of the bank material is <br />sand with gravel with a dry bulk density of 115 pounds per cubic foot. The internal angel of <br />friction was calculated to be 49 degrees. The residual and peak cohesion was reported at <br />0 and 450 pounds per square foot. The moisture content varied between 7.5 and 11.5%. A <br />cohesion of 0 was used in slope failure calculations. <br />The software program SLOPE/W and SEEP/W was used to estimate static bank failure <br />safety factors. Mine pit and river flood conditions with rapid drawdown scenarios were <br />simulated as well. These simulations were performed by CTL Thompson. The profile of <br />section 43+40 as shown on Plate C15 (Attachment A) was used to predict safety factors. <br />This section was chosen as it identifies the presence of a production gas transmission line <br />and has substantial pit side bank height. The soil conditions were replicated to match the <br />soil profile of soil boring B-6. Slope failure analyses were ran for the river and mine pit <br />sides of the bank. The modified Janbu method was used as it provided more conservative <br />safety factors. <br />The riverside stability results indicate factors of safety between 4.05 and 5.66. Simulations <br />for static, pseudo static, mine pit flood and river rapid drawdown were performed. The <br />same simulations were run for the pit side of the bank with calculated factors of safety <br />varying between 1.99 and 2.35. <br />The author used PCSTABL to evaluate slope stability at section 36+40. This section <br />appeared to have the steepest slope between the embankment and river of any cross <br />sections presented by Anderson Consulting. Static conditions and river side and pit side
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.