My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-01_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C2009087
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C2009087
>
2010-07-01_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C2009087
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:14:25 PM
Creation date
7/13/2010 10:21:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2009087
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/1/2010
Doc Name
Mining Plan Decision Document for C-0114093 (& C-88199)
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Email Name
JDM
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Alternative 2: Disapproval of the Proposed Mining Plan <br />(the "No Action" Alternative) <br />Under this alternative, the Assistant Secretary would <br />disapprove the mining plan for Federal lease C- 0114093. <br />If disapproved, about 7.80 million t (8.6 million tons) <br />of coal would not be mined (including about 6.26 million <br />t (6.9 million tons) of Federal coal). <br />B. Other Alternatives Considered But Eliminated From <br />Detailed Analysis <br />Approval of the Proposed Mining Plan with Special <br />Federal Conditions <br />No special Federal conditions are required to satisfy <br />the requirements of Federal laws, Executive orders, and <br />regulations, and the analysis of approval without <br />special Federal conditions did not result in the <br />identification of any impacts that could or should be <br />mitigated beyond that mitigation proposed in the PAP and <br />by Colorado DMG's conditions of approval. <br />C. NEPA Section 102(2)(E) Alternatives <br />This proposed project does not involve any unresolved <br />conflicts concerning alternative uses of available <br />resources. Therefore, consideration of alternatives <br />pursuant to section 102(2)(E) of NEPA, 42 U.S..C. §§ <br />4332(2)(E), is not required. <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.