My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_INSPECTION - C1981035 (50)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
_INSPECTION - C1981035 (50)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2020 2:12:11 PM
Creation date
7/7/2010 9:03:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
6/30/2010
Email Name
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS-COMPLIANCE <br /> Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br /> during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection <br /> and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br /> This was a Partial Inspection of the King Coal Mine conducted by Marcia Talvitie of the Colorado <br /> DRMS (Durango Field Office) beginning at 12:30 p.m. on Wednesday, 30 June 2010. The mine is <br /> operated by GCCC Energy, LLC. <br /> The King I Mine site is inactive,with the exception of demolition work and the bath house. Upon <br /> my arrival at the King II Mine, the active operation, I was directed to the office of Dan Meadors, <br /> Mine Manager. Following introductions, 1 was given on-site safety training by Art Trujillo. James <br /> Counts accompanied me on the inspection of the King 11 Mine. <br /> Signs and Markers <br /> Surface disturbance markers were posted at regular intervals around the surface operations <br /> area. <br /> Hydrologic Balance <br /> The sediment pond at King Il was completely dry. There has been no appreciable precipitation <br /> in the past several weeks. <br /> Mr. Counts pointed out the clean water diversion ditches, and explained that each ditch is <br /> "walked" on at least a weekly basis (and following major precipitation events). He has a <br /> thorough familiarity with each ditch and culvert. <br /> Water passing through the disturbed area is routed in a culvert pipe beneath the location of the <br /> soon-to-be-constructed bath house. <br /> Support Facilities <br /> Petroleum products are stored in a three-sided structure. The large tanks are set inside a <br /> concrete enclosure that Mr. Counts stated is sufficiently sized to provide secondary containment <br /> in the event of a spill. Drums are stored on specialized pallets with secondary containment <br /> capacity beneath. <br /> Revegetation <br /> GCC has an active weed control plan at the site. A truck-mounted sprayer and tank was <br /> purchased by the mine this season, and control efforts are now being done "in-house" rather <br /> than relying on contract sprayers as was previously done. <br /> Air Resource Protection <br /> The haul road into King II was recently sprayed with Magnesium Chloride,which produces a tight <br /> surface and substantially reduces the production of dust by traffic. <br /> The weather in recent weeks has been extremely dry. A light breeze easily kicked up dust at the <br /> turn-around area near the coal portal. I brought this to the attention of Mr. Meadors,who stated <br /> that they would continue to water the area as needed. <br /> This concludes the inspection report. I departed the site at 2:00 p.m. <br /> King Coal Mine C-1981-03S 30-Jun-2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.