My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-02_HYDROLOGY - M2002004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2010-07-02_HYDROLOGY - M2002004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:14:41 PM
Creation date
7/6/2010 7:32:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
7/2/2010
Doc Name
1st Half, 2010 Groundwater Monitoring Report
From
GCC Rio Grande
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
generally associated with leaching from granitic bedrock masses that underlay many <br />aquifers in the state. The Dakota formation in the Denver basin, which extends from <br />Pueblo to Wyoming, is also host to minor Uranium roll front deposits. These deposits form <br />when groundwater containing dissolved uranium comes into contact with reducing <br />conditions, causing precipitation of the Uranium. Such naturally occurring conditions are <br />the likely cause of the elevated gross alpha activities in the Dakota aquifer beneath the GCC <br />Facility. <br />Field Parameters <br />Field parameters including temperature, pH, and conductivity were collected during the <br />April 2010 sampling. The data collected indicate that pH at the site is very close to neutral. <br />Conductivity is highest in the alluvial wells where some turbidity was noted. <br />Quality Control <br />One set of field duplicate samples was collected during the monitoring event. Sample <br />Dup-01 was submitted as a blind field duplicate of primary alluvial well sample MW002. <br />Precision between the results of the primary and duplicate samples was very good for all <br />parameters tested. <br />One equipment rinsate blank was collected during the monitoring event. The blank was <br />collected by pouring laboratory-supplied de-ionized waxer through a new bailer and into the <br />' appropriate sample bottles. No target constituents were detected in the equipment blank. <br />All laboratory data packages were reviewed to ensure that quality control elements (holding <br />times, blanks, control samples, and matrix spikes), impacting precision and accuracy of the <br />groundwater results presented were within appropriate control limits. Data from the <br />contract laboratories was found to be acceptable in terms of data quality and industry <br />' standard presentation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.