Laserfiche WebLink
While Wildcat Corporation appreciates that the two 110 permits may be confusing and <br />contribute to challenge with respect to enforcement; Wildcat does not anticipate any <br />requirements for enforcement in the future. Additionally, withdrawing the two-110 permits and <br />submitting one-112 permit to cover both operations could only be accomplished with <br />permission from the Mine Land Reclamation Board (MLRB). The Idaho and May Day permits are <br />separate and distinct. Paper work regarding the two properties including storm water control <br />and discharge permits is separated. The data used to support "environmental baseline" <br />characterization is the same for both the May Day and Idaho projects because they exist <br />together in the same ecological and geological setting. The only common attribute is related to <br />the water right where both entities have the right to use the water for "mining, milling, <br />industrial, commercial, piscatorial, recreational, fire protection, municipal, domestic purposes, <br />replacement, exchange and augmentation purposes until such water is totally consumed". <br />June 25, 2010 Attachment 2