Laserfiche WebLink
buried on site, please describe the measures taken to minimize disturbances to the <br />hydrologic balance, prevent off-site damage, and provide for a stable configuration <br />consistent with the proposed future land use, as required under Rule 6.3.4(1)(e). <br />Exhibit D- Reclamation Plan has been revised and is attached in Attachment 23. This adequacy issue was <br />addressed on page 1. <br />Attachment 26 <br />Although required by Rule 6.3.5(1), none of the maps submitted with AM-01 show any section <br />corners adjacent to the proposed operation. Please submit new maps which satisfy all map <br />requirements of Rules 6.2.1(2) and 6.3.5 <br />See attachment <br />Attachment 27 <br />Section 6.3.30)(e) indicates that the bench at the Level 2 portal will be extended. The Level 2 <br />portal is located on the north side of the access road and the existing bench extends beyond the <br />south side of the access road. Yet, according to Exhibit E-7, no reclamation is planned for any <br />portion of the bench located on the south side of the access road. Please correct Exhibit E-7. <br />A revised Exhibit E-7 was provided in Attachment 9. Please see attachment 9. <br />Attachment 28 <br />Please address the seventeen adequacy issues identified by the Division's Geochemist, David Bird. <br />Attached is a memo Attachment C-3a drafted to address all David Bird's adequacy issues. <br />Attachment 29-Attachment 44 <br />Adequacy issues 29-44 are addressed in the response to David Bird's adequacy issues with no <br />additional language to be inserted into the May Day Mine and Mill Amended Permit Application M- <br />1981-185. <br />June 28, 2010 Response To DRMS Adequacy Issues May Day Mine and Mill Amendment M-1981-185