My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-19_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2010-06-19_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:13:37 PM
Creation date
6/28/2010 2:32:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/19/2010
Doc Name
Methane Drainage Project Winter Habitat and Wildlife Studies
From
Mountain Coal Company
To
United State Fish & Wildlife
Permit Index Doc Type
Wildlife
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Of the four listed sensitive species that could potentially occur in the project area during the <br />winter only two are known to occur. These are the American marten and northern goshawk. The <br />limited amount of, and habitat type, predominantly oakbrush/mountain shrub to be removed will <br />have very little affect on any members of these two species that might winter in the area. <br />During the winter surveys elk, northern goshawk and American marten were the only <br />management indicator species observed in the project area. <br />During average winters a few elk remain in the area to winter, but most move to lower elevations <br />in the North Fork Valley to winter. The amount of disturbance associated with the proposed <br />mining activities would be expected to have very little effect on what few elk may remain in the <br />area to winter. <br />Activities associated with the proposed operations during the winter would not affect deer as <br />they all move to lower elevations along the North Fork Valley to winter. <br />Only one additional raptor nest that was not observed during the baseline studies in 2007 was <br />observed during the winter surveys. This nest was located in an aspen stand did not appear to <br />have been active during the 2007 nesting season. <br />The large expanses of suitable habitat in comparison to the small amount of habitat that will be <br />disturbed by the proposed operations means that the viability of the wintering species within the <br />project area will probably not be affected. <br />23
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.