My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-04-26_PERMIT FILE - C1980007A (14)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2010-04-26_PERMIT FILE - C1980007A (14)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:08:44 PM
Creation date
6/28/2010 2:19:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/26/2010
Doc Name
Wetland Delineation Report
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 82 Appendix I
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a Soil profiles were excavated with the use of a Dutch auger, typically up to a depth of 24 inches below <br />the ground surface, or when bedrock was encountered, or when definitive hydric soil indicators were <br />encountered. The soil sample points reported in Appendix A were located close to the water -ward <br />extent of the wetland line, for the wetland sample point, and close to the land -ward extent of the <br />wetland line for the upland data point. The soil profiles from each boring were examined for hydric <br />soil indicators according to the Pocket Guide to Hydric Soil Field Indicators (Wetland Training <br />Institute 2004). Soil colors were determined with the aid of a Munsell soil color chart. Soil textures <br />were determined by feel. The hydrologic conditions within the immediate vicinity of each soil boring <br />were documented. <br />Vegetative plots were established for herbaceous layers, and when possible, in a nested fashion with <br />shrub and tree layers, within each wetland and adjacent upland. The plant species at each sample <br />location were identified and their wetland indicator status (for Region 8) was noted (Reed 1988; <br />USDA 2009). When the wetland indicator status for a species was inconclusive (i.e. "NI" — no <br />indicator status given), the status of the species in an adjacent Region was used. Efforts were made to <br />meet the Army Corps Delineation Manual plot size requirements for each stratum, but due to wetland <br />shape and size and steep site topography, smaller rectangular plots were often created, but still <br />covered a suitable percentage of wetland area. Dominant species were determined by use of the 50/20 <br />rule. <br />The delineated wetlands habitat types were classified using both the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />Circular 39 System (U.S. Fish and Wildlife 1956) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cowardin <br />System ( Cowardin et al. 1979). <br />3.2 Delineation Results <br />Three wetlands were encountered and delineated on the property, totaling ±0.266 acres. All three <br />wetlands are ground -water driven seepage wetlands, also referred to as slope wetlands. Since these <br />wetlands are fed by groundwater discharge, and not precipitation, it is likely that these wetlands are <br />inundated and saturated year -round and are not subject to seasonality or draw -down due to periods of <br />drought. Because: each wetland is uniform in habitat type and small in size, only one paired <br />wetland /upland set of sample points was prepared for each wetland. <br />The following narrative describes each of the three wetlands in additional detail. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.