My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-05-07_PERMIT FILE - C1994082A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1994082A
>
2010-05-07_PERMIT FILE - C1994082A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:11:37 PM
Creation date
6/28/2010 1:35:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/7/2010
Doc Name
POND 012 Slide Remediation Plan
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 13 ATTACHMENT 13-12B
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The weathered claystone materials were nil to slightly sandy, moderately to highly plastic, blocky, highly <br />fractured, moist to very moist and brown to gray in color. A coal layer, approximately 9 to 10 feet in <br />thickness was encountered below the weathered claystone materials in TH -13. Claystone -shale bedrock was <br />encountered below the coal layer and extended to the maximum depth investigated, 80 feet. Claystone -shale <br />bedrock materials were encountered in TH -14 below the weathered claystone materials and these bedrock <br />materials were encountered from approximately 55 to 95 feet bgs. Coal was encountered beneath the <br />claystone -shale bedrock materials in TH -14 at a depth of approximately 95 feet and extended to the <br />maximum depth investigated, 100 feet. <br />Groundwater was encountered in TH -13 and TH -14 at depths ranging from 58 to 70 feet bgs at the time of <br />drilling. The groundwater levels were encountered at depths ranging from 38 to 53 feet bgs when measured <br />3 to 73 days after drilling was completed. Depths at which groundwater was encountered, along with the <br />number of days after drilling that measurements were completed are shown on the test hole logs (Figure # 1). <br />Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on the results of measurements and observations made over <br />the last 18 months at the project site and our discussions with Seneca regarding possible solutions for <br />dewatering the slide area and stabilizing the slide area, NWCC has developed the following plans for <br />reducing the groundwater seepage into the failed areas, as well as site grading recommendations for bringing <br />the failed areas to a more stable configuration. <br />NWCC believes that groundwater flowing within the weathered claystone and claystone -shale bedrock <br />materials is daylighting within the overburden soils and fill materials resulting in the subject slope failure. <br />This groundwater must be intercepted upslope of the failure areas to improve stability. Based on the <br />information obtained from the test pit/trenches excavated in 2009, it does not appear feasible to construct <br />trench drains within the existing fill materials and overburden soils without laying/constructing these <br />materials to a flatter and more stable configuration. NWCC believes that the competent bedrock materials at <br />the site can be safely excavated to a 0.5 (Horizontal) to 1 (Vertical) slope configuration; however, the <br />existing fill materials, overburden soils and highly weathered bedrock materials should be excavated with <br />slope configurations on the order of 2 (Horizontal) to 1 (Vertical) or flatter. Based on our discussions with <br />Seneca, a plan has been developed that will consist of construction of a permanent/open dewatering trench <br />(Trench) along the upper portions of the failed area, and construction of a channel drain (Channel) <br />constructed at the toe of the failure area and within the existing drainage channel (YPM -6 -3). The <br />approximate locations of the proposed Trench and Channel are shown in the attached plans (Sheet 1 of 2). <br />It is NWCC's opinion that removal of saturated fill materials and overburden soils from the upper portion of <br />the failure during the construction of the Trench will significantly reduce the driving forces causing the <br />failed area to slide downhill. In addition, we believe that a well drained buttress (Channel) constructed at <br />the toe of the failed area will assist in drainage and stabilization of the failed materials. <br />Due to the amount of groundwater seepage that has been encountered at the site, NWCC recommends <br />drainage collection systems be installed in the base of the Trench and Channel. The drainage systems <br />should consist of slotted, 4 to 6 -inch diameter PVC pipe (SDR -35) surrounded by relatively free draining <br />gravels. NWCC recommends free draining gravels consist of screened gravels ranging from 3/8 to 4 inches <br />Job Number: 07 -7600 NWCC, Inc. Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.