My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-05-04_PERMIT FILE - C1994082
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
2010-05-04_PERMIT FILE - C1994082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:11:20 PM
Creation date
6/28/2010 1:24:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/4/2010
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 15 Hydrologic Monitoring Program
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
cross section and values of the stream velocities measured with a current meter, or a float to determine <br />velocity. Float velocities are multiplied by a correction factor of 0.8 (Brakensiek et al., 1979 and Buchanan <br />and Sumers, 1968). <br />Sites YSSF2, YSSF3, WSSF3, YSAF4, and YSGF5 have been equipped with Parshall flumes and <br />continuous flow recorders. Continuous flow is not monitored in the winter since the flumes and float stilling <br />wells freeze up. Rating curves used for flume data reduction were derived by comparison of stage heights <br />with flow measurements obtained by the methods mentioned in the previous paragraph. <br />Procedures used to collect ground water quality samples are dictated by individual well site conditions such <br />as casing diameter, depth to water, casing storage volume, rate of recovery, and pumping capabilities of <br />sampling equipment. Alluvial and bedrock wells are sampled by purging a minimum volume of water at a <br />constant rate while concurrently measuring field parameters (temperature, pH, and electrical conductivity) <br />for stability, and then collecting the sample once the field parameters have stabilized and the minimum <br />volume of water has been purged. The minimum purge volume, purge rate, and sampling device has been <br />established for each monitoring well based on consideration of well site conditions, field parameter <br />measurements, and evaluation of water quality analytical results. Table 15-7, Ground Water Quality <br />. Monitoring Procedures, Yoast Mine, presents the ground water sampling procedures put into effect in <br />August, 1993. For procedures prior to that, see the remarks page that accompanies the water quality data <br />presented in Appendix 74, Ground Water Chemistry Data. <br />Devices used to sample alluvial wells include either bailers or submersible pumps, and either bailers, <br />submersible pumps, or positive displacement pumps are used to sample bedrock wells. Ground water <br />levels are measured with an electronic water level indicator. Water levels in some shallow alluvial wells are <br />measured directly with a steel tape. <br />Sampling protocol is reviewed and maintained in a systematic fashion that delivers reliable data. Peabody <br />will continue to implement improvements in sampling protocol to minimize errors affecting both field <br />chemistry measurements and sample collection. <br />C7 <br />20 Revised 2/99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.