My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-28_REVISION - C1982056
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2010-06-28_REVISION - C1982056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:14:09 PM
Creation date
6/28/2010 8:25:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/28/2010
Doc Name
Adequacy Responses
From
Twentymile Coal Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR73
Email Name
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TWENTYMILE COAL, LLC - FOIDEL CREEK MINE (C-82-056) <br />TR10-73, 19-RIGHT MINE DEWATERING INSTALLATION <br />TECHNICAL ADEQUACY RESPONSES (06/10) <br />1. Appendix A, revised page TRIO-73, does not include the reclamation costs for the entire proposed <br />disturbance. Revised page 2.05-50.9 proposes to backfill and grade the trench incrementally as <br />the pipeline is installed. Reclamation costs must be included for the entire length of the <br />disturbance. <br />Please include costs for backfilling and grading and topsoil replacement for the entire 7.5 acres of <br />disturbance. <br />Response: The reclamation cost estimate has been reviewed and revised to reflect reclamation costs <br />for the entire disturbance area, even though most of the pipeline reclamation will occur concurrently <br />with construction. The revised reclamation cost estimate accompanies these responses. <br />2. Current approved permit page 2.04.9 does not include discussion concerning the presence of <br />cultural and historic resources, and no revised page 2.04-9 was included with the TR-73 submittal. <br />Please indicate if the area of disturbance does not affect cultural and historic resources, or if a <br />cultural and historic resources survey has been conducted of the proposed disturbance area. <br />Response: TC had deferred a cultural resources survey for this area until ground conditions were <br />suitable for access. A survey is scheduled within the next week, and we anticipate that we should be <br />able to provide survey results and a revised page 2.04.9 within the next two weeks. <br />3. Current approved Map 29, Reclamation Map, does not include the disturbance proposed in TR-73. <br />Please provide a revised Map 29 to reflect the proposed reclamation associated with the activities <br />proposed in TR-73. <br />Response: Map 29 has been revised to reflect the proposed disturbance associated with TRIO-73. A <br />copy of the revised map accompanies these responses.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.